Discourse and Unequal Diplomacy

A Critical Textual Analysis of the U.S.-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement

Authors

  • Fatima Sahem Khalil College of Arts, University of Baghdad
  • Prof. Nassier Abbas Ghubin Al-Zubaidi Department of English, College of Arts, University of Baghdad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/9a2myp05

Keywords:

Critical Textual Analysis, U.S.-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA), Power Dynamics, Ideological Constructs, Diplomatic Language

Abstract

This study examined the U.S.-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA), through the lens of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), to uncover power dynamics and ideological constructs embedded within its discourse. The research aimed to identify the textual strategies that shape power relations and influence diplomatic discourse. Adopting Fairclough’s (2015) CDA model, the study employed qualitative-quantitative research methodology to analyze graphological, lexico-semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic resources. Findings revealed that transitivity structures, modal expressions, and speech acts reinforce the U.S. dominance, framing Iraq as a recipient rather than an equal partner. The strategic use of euphemisms, metaphors, and overwording obscures power imbalance while presenting a narrative of cooperation. Despite its formal neutrality, the SFA embeds asymmetrical power relations, shaping Iraq’s political, economic, and security framework. Finally, a set of conclusions and implications are provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, K.W., Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3),421-456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280

Afzaal, M., & Chishti, M. I. (2021). Exploring the image of China in the diplomatic discourse: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 2(IV), 120-133. http://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2021(2-IV)11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2021(2-IV)11

Antonio,C.(2001). International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aust, A. (2013). Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152341

Bassiouni, M. Cherif (2010). Legal Status of US Forces in Iraq From 2003-2008, Chicago Journal of International Law: 11(1), Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol11/iss1/3

Berridge, G. J., & James, A. (2003). A Dictionary of Diplomacy. New York. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501348

Bhatia. V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum International.

Bianchi, A. (2016). International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725114.001.0001

Constantinou, C.M.(2005).Treaty. In New Dictionary of the History of Ideas,(Vol.6, pp. 2373-2376). Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Dadush, U. (2020). A glossary of diplomatic terms. World Trade Review, 19(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745620000160

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.

Hashim, S. S. M. (2009). Conventional implicature in English legal/diplomatic texts: International conventions. Journal of Anbar University for Language & Literature,1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37654/aujll.2009.63916

Hu, K.B. & Li, C. (2018). Research on the translation and dissemination of the discourse of great power diplomacy with Chinese characteristics: connotation methodology and significance[J]. China Translation (04), 5-12+129.

Hussein, A. S., & Ahmed, M. H. (2020). Representation, attribution and perspectivation in EU diplomatic discourse addressed to Iraq. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(10), 188. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.10.21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.10.21

Ismailova, F., Rayeva, G., Koblanova, A., Yelikbayev, B. & Yessenova, K. (2020). Analysis of Political and Diplomatic Language in Linguistic, Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects. Opción, 36(91), 803-819. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7643168.pdf

Katzman, K., & Humud, C. E. (2015). Iraq: Politics and governance (CRS Report No. RS21968). Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/mideast/RS21968.pdf

Klabbers, J. (2017). International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Kleiner, J. (2008). The inertia of diplomacy. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 19(2), 321-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290802096380

Kone, N. (2020). Speech Acts in UN Treaties: A Pragmatic Perspective. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10, 813- 827. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.10605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.106051

Kress G., Van Leeuwen, T., (2021). Reading images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd Ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

Mattila, H. E. S. (2013). Comparative legal linguistics: Language of law, Latin, and modern lingua francas (2nd ed.). Ashgate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/2049677X.2.1.143

McEwan, D. (1986). The function of legal and diplomatic language in reducing ambiguity. In P.M. Tiersma (Ed.), Legal Language (pp.80-95). London: Routledge.

Ministry of Justice of Finland, 2016. Lainkirjoittajan opas. [Legal writer’s guide]. Available from: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-259-318-4 [Accessed 14 February 2025].

Nexon, D. (2009). The balance of power in the balance. World Politics, 61(2), 330-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000124

U.S. Department of State. (2021). Joint statement on the U.S.-Iraq strategic dialogue [Media note]. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov

Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications.

Shelton D. (1997). Compliance with International Human Rights Soft Law. In International compliance with nonbinding accords, ed. EB Weiss,119-43. Washington, D.C.: American Society of International Law.

Simmons, B.(2010).Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science, 13(1), 273-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.132713

Slomanson, W. R. (2011). Fundamental Perspectives on International Law (6th ed.).Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Tiersma, P. (2010). Legal Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

United Nations. (1980-2009) Treaties and international Agreements registered and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations. New York: United Nations Publication.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Khalil, F. ., & Al-Zubaidi, N. . (2026). Discourse and Unequal Diplomacy: A Critical Textual Analysis of the U.S.-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement. Al-Adab Journal, 68(2), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.31973/9a2myp05

Publication Dates

Received

2025-04-23

Revised

2025-05-13

Accepted

2025-05-13

Published Online First

2026-06-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1364

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.