Exploring the distinction between Al-generated stories and Human-crafted narratives

A comparative study

Authors

  • Dr. Ali Baram Mohammed Sulaimani Polytechnic University, DATI, Sulaymanyah, Kurdistan, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/w8qv3d58

Keywords:

AI, Stories, The Necklace, The Gilded Watch, Impact

Abstract

Recently, there has been significant debate about the emergence of AI in creative domains and its impact on storytelling and narrative creation. While some studies suggest that human-authored and AI-generated stories are barely distinguishable, others find that AI-generated stories are poorly structured and often contain repetitive phrases. This study narrows its focus by examining the classic twisty tale The Necklace (1884) by French author Guy de Maupassant, scrutinizing its key features alongside another similar story generated by AI. The AI was provided with six specific prompts to produce a story closely resembling The Necklace and generated a tale titled The Gilded Watch. The two stories are analyzed based on four criteria: narrative structure, character development, language and style, and cultural or historical context.

The study finds a significant disparity between AI-generated and human-authored stories, with the former often lacking key storytelling elements. It also suggests that AI’s ability to capture human emotions remains limited.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AI. (2024). The gilded watch: AI’s tool; ChatGPT.

Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.00002

Begus, N. (2024). Experimental narratives: A comparison of human crowdsourced storytelling and AI storytelling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02102-1

Browne, R. (2023, April 17). Italy became the first Western country to ban ChatGPT. Here’s what other countries are doing. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/04/italy-has-banned-chatgpt-heres-what-other-countries-are-doing.html

Deorgiou, G. (2024). Differentiating between human-written and AI-generated texts using linguistic features automatically extracted from an online computational tool. arXiv, arXiv:2402.00005. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00005

Hamilton, E. (2024, October 21). People hate stories they think were written by AI: Even if they were written by people. Science Daily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/10/241021170347.htm

Harari, Y. N. (2023). AI and the future of humanity. Frontiers Forum. https://frontiersforum.org/speaker/yuval-noah-harari

Hayawi, K., Shahriar, S., & Mathew, S. (2023). The imitation game: Detecting human and AI-generated texts in the era of ChatGPT and BRAD. arXiv, arXiv:2311.00004. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00004

Huang, X., Vishnubhota, K., & Rudzicz, F. (2024). The GPT-writing prompts dataset: A comparative analysis of character portrayal in short stories. arXiv, arXiv:2401.00002. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00002

Johnson, B. M. (2025, January 3). Generative AI for cultural heritage preservation. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387668842_Generative_AI_for_Cultural_Heritage_Preservation

Maupassant, G. de. (1884). The necklace (La Parure). Le Gaulois.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Critical-Thinking%3A-The-Nature-of-Critical-and-Paul-Elder/8bc9e8bfe26e71fdf1cb68c93d7561c478d7c032

Schulten, K. (2023, January 24). Lesson plan: Teaching and learning in the era of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/24/learning/lesson-plans/lesson-plan-teaching-and-learning-in-the-era-of-chatgpt.html

Published

2026-03-20

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Mohammed, A. (2026). Exploring the distinction between Al-generated stories and Human-crafted narratives: A comparative study. Al-Adab Journal, 157. https://doi.org/10.31973/w8qv3d58

Publication Dates

Received

2025-05-19

Revised

2025-06-01

Accepted

2025-06-02

Published Online First

2026-06-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 987

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)