Exploring the distinction between Al-generated stories and Human-crafted narratives
A comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/w8qv3d58Keywords:
AI, Stories, The Necklace, The Gilded Watch, ImpactAbstract
Recently, there has been significant debate about the emergence of AI in creative domains and its impact on storytelling and narrative creation. While some studies suggest that human-authored and AI-generated stories are barely distinguishable, others find that AI-generated stories are poorly structured and often contain repetitive phrases. This study narrows its focus by examining the classic twisty tale The Necklace (1884) by French author Guy de Maupassant, scrutinizing its key features alongside another similar story generated by AI. The AI was provided with six specific prompts to produce a story closely resembling The Necklace and generated a tale titled The Gilded Watch. The two stories are analyzed based on four criteria: narrative structure, character development, language and style, and cultural or historical context.
The study finds a significant disparity between AI-generated and human-authored stories, with the former often lacking key storytelling elements. It also suggests that AI’s ability to capture human emotions remains limited.
Downloads
References
AI. (2024). The gilded watch: AI’s tool; ChatGPT.
Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.00002
Begus, N. (2024). Experimental narratives: A comparison of human crowdsourced storytelling and AI storytelling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02102-1
Browne, R. (2023, April 17). Italy became the first Western country to ban ChatGPT. Here’s what other countries are doing. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/04/italy-has-banned-chatgpt-heres-what-other-countries-are-doing.html
Deorgiou, G. (2024). Differentiating between human-written and AI-generated texts using linguistic features automatically extracted from an online computational tool. arXiv, arXiv:2402.00005. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00005
Hamilton, E. (2024, October 21). People hate stories they think were written by AI: Even if they were written by people. Science Daily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/10/241021170347.htm
Harari, Y. N. (2023). AI and the future of humanity. Frontiers Forum. https://frontiersforum.org/speaker/yuval-noah-harari
Hayawi, K., Shahriar, S., & Mathew, S. (2023). The imitation game: Detecting human and AI-generated texts in the era of ChatGPT and BRAD. arXiv, arXiv:2311.00004. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00004
Huang, X., Vishnubhota, K., & Rudzicz, F. (2024). The GPT-writing prompts dataset: A comparative analysis of character portrayal in short stories. arXiv, arXiv:2401.00002. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00002
Johnson, B. M. (2025, January 3). Generative AI for cultural heritage preservation. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387668842_Generative_AI_for_Cultural_Heritage_Preservation
Maupassant, G. de. (1884). The necklace (La Parure). Le Gaulois.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Critical-Thinking%3A-The-Nature-of-Critical-and-Paul-Elder/8bc9e8bfe26e71fdf1cb68c93d7561c478d7c032
Schulten, K. (2023, January 24). Lesson plan: Teaching and learning in the era of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/24/learning/lesson-plans/lesson-plan-teaching-and-learning-in-the-era-of-chatgpt.html
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Ali Baram Mohammed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.



