A PHONO-PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF ASSERTIVENESS AND RHETORICAL QUESTIONING IN SELECTED ENGLISH AND ARABIC ELECTION SPEECHES

Authors

  • Ahmed Mohammed Gumar University of Baghdad/ College of Arts/ Department of English
  • Prof. Nassier Abbas Ghubin Al-Zubaidi University of Baghdad/ College of Arts/ Department of English

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/te7ywx20

Keywords:

Phono-Pragmatics, Prosodic maxims, Assertiveness, Rhetorical questioning, Argumentative strategies

Abstract

The study presents a phono-pragmatic analysis of the argumentative strategies of assertiveness and rhetorical questioning in selected English and Arabic election speeches. Assertiveness is a strategy used to convey conviction and determination to the discourse. Rhetorical questioning is a strategy that is not used to elicit an answer, but to bring a problem to the minds of people and to make them think of it. To convey such meanings prosodically, politicians use a set of prosodic maxims with these strategies. The study aims at investigating the contribution of prosodic features and maxims to the transfer of the pragmatic meanings associated to these strategies. It also examines the universality of these argumentative strategies and their prosodic maxims. It is hypothesized that there is a correlation between the prosodic maxims and the argumentative strategies under investigation, and that they are universal in the English and Arabic election speeches. To test the validity of the study hypotheses, two TV shows are selected. They are the English TV show “Ohio U.S. Senate Debate”, which is broadcasted on the American NBC4 channel, and the Arabic one “The Opposite Direction”, which is broadcasted on Al-Jazeera Channel, are selected. To analyze the selected data, synthesis of Braga and Marques’ (2004) phono-pragmatic model and Wennerstrom’s (2001) discoursal functions of intonation model are adopted. The study comes up with the findings that there is a correlation between the prosodic maxims and argumentative strategies, that they are used universally, and that some variables of each prosodic maxim are more frequently used than others.

Downloads

References

Braga, D., & Marques, M.A. (2004) The Pragmatics of Prosodic Features in the Political Debate. In Speech Prosody Nara, Japan 23-26 March 2004, (pp. 321-324).

Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse Intonation in L2: From Theory and Research to Practice (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2006). Prosodic and Paralinguistic Correlates of Social Categories. In Ardener, E. (Ed.). Social Anthropology and Language (pp.185-206). London: Routledge.

Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Iaia, P. L., Provenzano M. & Sperti S. (2016). ELF Reformulations of Italian ‘Lingua Franca’ Uses in the Subtitling of the Migration Movie Lamerica. In Lopriore L. & Grazzi E. ‏(eds.) Intercultural Communication. New Perspectives from ELF (pp. 233-255). Roma, Maggio: RomaTrE-Press.

Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2014). A course in Phonetics. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

O’Connell, D. C. & Kowal, S. (1983). Pausology. In W. A. Sedelow & S. Y. Sedelow (Eds.), Computers in Language Research 2 (Vol. 2) (pp. 221- 301). Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.

Oliveira, M. (2002). The Role of Pause Occurrence and Pause Duration in the Signaling of Narrative Structure. In Ranchod, E., & Mamede, N. J. (Eds.), Advances in Natural Language Processing Third International Conference, Portal 2002, Faro, Portugal, June 23-26, 2002. Proceedings (pp. 43-51). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Poyatos, F. (2002). Nonverbal communication across disciplines. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.

Reetz, H., & Jongman, A. (2020). Phonetics Transcription, Production, Acoustics, and Perception (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.

Sánchez-Mompeán, S. (2019). More than words can say Exploring prosodic variation in dubbing. In Ranzato, I., & Zanotti, S. (Eds.), Reassessing dubbing: Historical Approaches and Current Trends (pp. 191-209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Wennerstrom, A. (2001). The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-15

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Gumar, A., & Al-Zubaidi, N. . (2025). A PHONO-PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF ASSERTIVENESS AND RHETORICAL QUESTIONING IN SELECTED ENGLISH AND ARABIC ELECTION SPEECHES. Al-Adab Journal, 152, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.31973/te7ywx20

Publication Dates

Received

2024-05-29

Revised

2024-06-05

Accepted

2024-06-09

Published Online First

2025-03-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 134

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.