Violence and Warfare
A Critical Assessment of the Just War Tradition in a Rebalancing World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/66z91631Keywords:
war, violence, just war, Warfare, Cosmopolitanism, Anti-Cosmopolitanism, PluralismAbstract
The Just War tradition (JWT) is viewed in this paper as a corpus of ideas that discusses the morality and ethics of war. It has changed throughout more than 1,500 years, making it a complicated one. The Just War tradition is broad and multifaceted, yet it is confined within some essential principles that determine its boundaries. It differs from pacifism in that it holds that wars can occasionally be justified and from realism, which views war as outside the purview of moral judgment, in that it holds that both the choice to go to war and the tactics used in conducting it are subject to moral inspection. Within such confines, just war theorists disagree with one another not only about subtleties of the theory but also over fundamental issues like whether or not a war may be justified by something other than the necessity of defending oneself against an already-initiated armed attack. This paper's main goal is to provide a clear and comprehensive understanding of the JWT, the conditions under which it permits and restricts acceptable damages and the moral conundrums these arguments raise. Regarding modern just war theory, one of the central concerns is whether war can be fought and damage done for "humanitarian" or "cosmopolitan" purposes, including protecting human rights. Stated differently, the question is whether there exists a clear and present need to conduct war. This paper lays out the main problems with the use of violence, evaluates the cosmopolitan and anti-cosmopolitan contributions to Just War thinking, and ends with some observations on the suitability of Just War thinking and its connection to cosmopolitanism.
Downloads
References
Aina, N.C. and Nnamdi, B.O. (2020). World of Our Making. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Bellamy, A.J. (2014). “Motives, Outcome, Intent, and the Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention,” Journal of Military Ethics 3 (3): 216–232.
Bellamy, A.J. (2016). Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Bellamy, A. (2018) Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Polity.
Buchanan, A. (2010) ‘Rawls’s Law of the Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World’, Ethics 110/4: 697–721.
Buchanan, A., and Keohane, R. (2014) ‘The Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal’, Ethics and International Affairs 18/1: 1–22.
Bull, H. (1983) Justice in International Relations (The Hagey Lectures). Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo.
Burke, A. (2014). “Just War or Ethical Peace? Moral Discourses of Strategic Violence after 9/11,” International Affairs 80 (2): 337.
Caney, S. (2015) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ceadal, M. (1989) Thinking about Peace and War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalter, A. (2022). Predators and Parasites: Persistent Agents of Transnational Harm and Great Power Authority. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Coady, C. A. J. (2014) ‘Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency’, International Ethics 114 (July): 772–89.
Coates, A. J. (1997) The Ethics of War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Cox, R. (1981). “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,”
Millennium 10 (2): 126–155.
Detter, I. (2010). The Law of War, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dower, N. (1998) World Ethics: The New Agenda. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Elshtain, J. (1992) Just War Theory. New York: New York University Press.
Elshtain, J. (2013) Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. New York: Basic Books.
Elshtain, J. (2015) ‘Against The New Utopianism’, Ethics and International Affairs 19/2: 91–5.
Elshtain, J.B. (2017). “Terrorism,” in Charles Reed and David Ryall, eds, The Price of Peace: Just War in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, M. (2015). Moral Theory and the Idea of a Just War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fixdal, M., and Smith, D. (2008) ‘Humanitarian Intervention and Just War’, Mershon International Studies Review 42: 283–312.
Gunnell, J. (1974) Political Theory, Tradition and Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop, Inc.
Habermas, J. (1999) ‘Between Bestiality and Humanity: A War on the Border between Legality and Morality’, Constellations 6/3: 263–74.
Habermas, J. (2013) ‘Interpreting the Fall of a Monument’, Constellations 18/3: 364–70.
Hayden, P. (2015). “Security beyond the State: Cosmopolitanism, Peace and the Role of Just War Theory,” in Mark Evans, ed., Just War Theory: A Reappraisal. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heinze, E.A. (2018). “The New Utopianism: Liberalism, American Foreign Policy, and the War in Iraq,” Journal of International Political Theory 4 (1): 105–125.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2011). The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre.
Jackson, R. H. (2010) The Global Covenant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jochnick, C., and. Normand, R. (2004) ‘The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War’, Harvard International Law Journal 49: 49–95.
Johnson, J.T. (1999). Morality and Contemporary Warfare. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kant, I. ([1795] 1983) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, trans. Ted Humphrey. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Keohane, W. (2014) Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moellendorf, D. (2012) Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Nardin, T. ed. (2012a) The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nardin, T. (2012b) ‘The Moral Basis of Humanitarian Intervention’, Ethics and International Affairs 16/1: 57–70.
Orend, B. (1999) ‘Crisis in Kosovo: A Just Use of Force?’ Politics 19/3: 125–30.
Orend, B. (2010). Michael Walzer on War and Justice. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.
Orend, B. (2012). “Justice after War,” Ethics and International Affairs 16 (1): 43–56.
Orend, B. (2015) Philosophy of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Orend, B. (2017). The Morality of War. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.
Pillar, P.R. (1983). Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reiss, H.S. (1991). Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rengger, N. (2012) ‘On the Just War Tradition in the Twenty- fi rst Century’, International Affairs 78/2: 353–63.
Reus- Smit, C. (2015) ‘Liberal Hierarchy and the License to Use Force’, Review of International Studies 31 (December): 71–92.
Rigby, A. (2015). “Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Jus Post Bellum,” in Mark Evans, ed., Just War Theory: A Reappraisal. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rupert, M. (2020). “Marxism and Critical Theory,” in Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds, International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Russett, B. (2015). “Bushwhacking the Democratic Peace,” International Studies Perspectives 6 (4): 399–402.
Sjoberg, L. (2016) ‘Gendered Realities of the Immunity Principle: Why Gender Analysis Needs Feminism’, ISQ 50/4 (December): 889–910.
Taylor, A.J.P. (1985). How Wars End. London: Hamilton, 1985.
Walzer, M. (1977) Just and Unjust Wars. Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin.
Walzer, M. (1999) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Walzer, M. (2000). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd edition. New York: Basic Books.
Walzer, M. (2012) On Toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Walzer, M. (2014) Arguing about War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Williams, R. E., and Caldwell, D. (2016) ‘Jus Post Bellum: Just War Theory and the Principles of Just Peace’, International Studies Perspectives 7: 309–20.
Williamson, A. M. (2023). “Sovereignty under Attack: The International Society Meets the al Qaeda Network,” Review of International Studies 31(1): 45–68.
Zinn, H. (2012). The Power of Non-Violence: Writings by Advocates for Peace. Boston:
Hope-Beacon Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bimbo OGUNBANJO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
