Institutions and Mobilization
Explaining and Understanding the Intersection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/h7axmf62Keywords:
politics, institutions, mobilization, Collective Action, Social MovementsAbstract
This paper highlights how institutions often shape the paths available for political involvement. Many formal, lawful, and effective institutional avenues for people to express their aspirations are associated with significant extra-institutional action; this is one of the most significant conclusions drawn from the mobilization literature. With institutions serving as the independent variable, most scholarly studies have concentrated on how institutions affect mobilization. There is also a smaller body of study that examines the effects of mobilization on formal institutions, particularly about party politics, voting processes, and legal frameworks. Additionally, a large number of academics have examined institutions inside movements as well as movements within institutions as worthwhile areas of study. This paper identifies fourteen consensus propositions about the connections between institutions and mobilization. Although these fourteen conclusions are frequently taken for granted, further empirical testing is necessary to assess their robustness over a larger number of situations and historical periods. For this reason, they are given as testable hypotheses. The next section outlines three main obstacles to determining more widespread causal patterns: (1) a conceptual ambiguity in defining pertinent "institutions" as study subjects; (2) a dearth of worldwide data on protest and mobilization that could produce empirical findings that are broadly applicable; and (3) a historical propensity to extrapolate conclusions from a limited number of Western cases. To improve our collective grasp of the links between these notions, a few substantive and methodological approaches are suggested in the paper's conclusion.
Downloads
References
Alimi, Eitan Y. 2019. “Mobilizing Under the Gun: Theorizing Political Opportunity Structure in a Highly Repressive Setting.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 14(2): 219–237.
Amenta, Edwin. 2016. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Amenta, Edwin and Yvonne Zylan. 1991. “It Happened Here: Political Opportunity, the New Institutionalism, and the Townsend Movement.” American Sociological Review 56(2): 250–265.
Amenta, Edwin and Kelly M. Ramsey. 2010. “Institutional Theory.” In The Handbook of Politics: State and Civil Society in Global Perspective, ed. Kevin T. Leicht and J. Craig Jenkins. New York: Springer, pp. 15–39.
Asal, Victor, Amy Pate, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 2018. “Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior Data and Codebook Version 9/2018.” Online at: www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/data.asp.
Asal, Victor, Mitchell Brown, and Angela Dalton. 2012. “Why Split? Organizational Splits Among Ethnopolitical Organizations in the Middle East.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(1): 163–191.
Banks, Arthur S., Thomas C. Muller, and William R. Overstreet. 2014. Political Handbook of the World. Binghamton: CSA Publications.
Bawn, Kathleen and Frances Rosenbluth. 2016. “Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 251–266.
Beardsley, Kyle. 2018. “Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 723–740.
Beissinger, Mark R. 2017. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5(2): 259–276.
—. 2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107(3): 574–292.
Birch, Sarah. 2011. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bunce, Valerie J. and Sharon L. Wolchik. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, Sabine C. 2016. “The Dynamic Relationship between Protest and Repression.” Political Research Quarterly 59(1): 1–11.
Chandra, Kanchan. 2014. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chenoh, Erica. 2013. “Terrorism and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 355–378.
Chenoh, Erica and Maria J. Steph. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chenoh, Erica and Orion A. Lew. 2013. “Unpacking Nonviolent Campaigns: Introducing NAVCO 2.0.” Journal of Peace Research 50(3): 415–423.
Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology 98(4): 755–798.
Conrad, Courtenay and Will Moore. 2010. “What Stops the Torture?” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 459–476.
Corcoran, Katie E., David Pettinicchio, and Jacob T. N. Young. 2011. “The Context of Control: A Cross-national Investigation of the Link between Political Institutions, Efficacy, and Collective Action.” British Journal of Social Psychology 50(4): 575–605.
Davenport, Christian. 2017. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 1–23.
Della Porta, Donatella. 2016. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeNardo, James. 1985. Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Diermeyer, Daniel and Keith Krehbiel. 2013. “Institutionalism as a Methodology.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (2): 123–144.
Eisinger, Peter. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67(1): 11–28.
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Jan Kubik. 1998. “Contentious Politics in New Democracies: East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia 1989–1993.” World Politics 50(4): 547–581.
Elster, Jon. 1993. “Constitution-Making in Eastern Europe: Rebuilding the Boat in the Open Sea.” Public Administration 71 (1–2): 169–217.
Fearon, James. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization 52 (2): 269–305.
Francisco, Ronald A. 2019. Dynamics of Conflict. New York: Springer.
—. 2010. Collective Action Theory and Empirical Evidence. New York: Springer.
Frantz, Erika and Andrea Kendall-Taylor. 2014. “A Dictator’s Toolkit: Understanding How Co-optation Affects Repression in Autocracies.” Journal of Peace Research 51(3): 332–346.
Gailmard, Sean. 2023. “Accountability and Principal–Agent Theory.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, ed. Mark Bovens, Robert Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gamson, William A. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2018. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What do we Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.
Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erika Frantz. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Dataset.” Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 313–331.
George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett. 2015. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giugni, Marco, Ruud Koopmans, Florence Passy, and Paul Statham. 2015. “Institutional and Discursive Opportunities for Extreme-right Mobilization in Five Countries.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 16(1): 145–162.
Goldstone, Jack A. 1991. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
—. ed. 2013. States, Parties, and Social Movements. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Jeff. 2011. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hardin, Russell. 1989. “Why a Constitution.” In The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, ed. Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman. New York: Agathon Press.
Heger, Lindsay and Danielle Jung. 2014. “Negotiating with Rebel Governments: The Effect of Service Provision on Conflict Negotiations.” Manuscript.
Hendrix, Cullen. 2010. “Measuring State Capacity: Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Study of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Peace 47(3): 273–285.
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Houtzager, Peter P. and Marcus J. Kurtz. 2010. “The Institutional Roots of Popular Mobilization: State Transformation and Rural Politics in Brazil and Chile, 1960–1995.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 42(2): 394–424.
Hutter, Swen and Marco Giugni. 2019. “Protest Politics in a Changing Political Context: Switzerland, 1975–2005.” Swiss Political Science Review 15(3): 427–461.
Jung, Jai Kwan. 2010. “Disentangling Protest Cycles: An Event-history Analysis of New Social Movements in Western Europe.” An International Quarterly 12(1): 25–44.
Khawaja, Marwan. 1993. “Repression and Popular Collective Action: Evidence from the West Bank.” Sociological Forum 8(1):47–71.
King, Brayden G., Marie Cornwall, and Eric C. Dahlin. 2015. “Winning Woman Suffrage One Step at a Time: Social Movements and the Logic of the Legislative Process.” Social Forces 83(3): 1211–1234.
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koopmans, Ruud. 1993. “The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989.” American Sociological Review 58(5): 637–658.
—. 2015. “The Missing Link between Structure and Agency: Outline of an Evolutionary Approach to Social Movements.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 10(1): 19–33.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kurzman, Charles. 1996. “Structural Opportunity and Perceived Opportunity in Social-movement Theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979.” American Sociological Review 61(1): 153–170.
—. 2014. The Unthinkable Revolution in Iran. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lichbach, Mark I. 1995. The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2016. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manin, Bernard. 1997. Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
March, James G. and Johan P. Olson. 2016. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.
Martin, Lanny and Georg Vanberg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions. New York: Oxford University Press.
—. 2013. “Multiparty Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Public Spending.” Journal of Politics 75 (4): 953–967.
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “The Framing Function of Movement Tactics: Strategic Dramaturgy in the American Civil Rights Movement.” In Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings, ed. Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–354.
—. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, Douglas and Yang Su. 2012. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting, 1965 to 1973.” American Sociological Review 67(5): 696–721.
McAdam, Doug and Sidney Tarrow. 2010. “Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements.” Politics 8(2): 529–542.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney G. Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2011. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitives in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12 (3): 472–482.
March, James G. and Johan P. Olson. 2016. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.
Martin, Brian. 2017. Justice Ignited: The Dynamics of Backfire. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Milgrom, Paul, Douglass North, and Barry Weingast. 1990. “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Medieval Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs.” Economics and Politics 2 (March): 1–23.
Miller, Gary. 2015. “The Political Evolution of Principal–Agent Models.” Review of Political Science 8: 203–225.
Moe, Terry. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6 (Special Issue): 213–253.
Moore, Will. 2010. “The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(1): 107–127.
North, Douglass and Barry Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England.” Journal of Economic History XLIX (4): 803–832.
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osa, Maryjane and Cristina Corduneanu-Huci. 2013. “Running Uphill: Political Opportunity in Nondemocracies.” Comparative Sociology 2(4): 605–629.
Özler, Ilgü. 2013. “Political Institutions and Protest: A Comparative Analysis.” Representation 49(2): 135–154.
Pearlman, Wendy. 2011. Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, B. Guy. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. London and New York: Pinter.
—. 2015. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. London and New York: Continuum.
Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.
Putnam, Robert. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rasler, Karen. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 61(1): 132–152.
Robertson, Graeme B. 2010. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-communist Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Romer, Thomas and Howard Rosenthal. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33: 27–43.
Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 1998. “Institutional Commitments and Democracy.” European Journal of Sociology 39 (1): 78–109.
Salehyan, Idean, Cullen S. Hendrix, Jesse Hamner, Christina Case, Christopher Linebarger, Emily Stull, and Jennifer Williams. 2012. “Social Conflict in Africa: A New Database.” International Interactions 38(4): 503–511.
Sandler, Todd. 1992. Collective Action: Theory and Applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Schaffer, F. C. and Andreas Schedler. 2017. “What Is Vote Buying?” In Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying, ed. F. C. Schaffer. Colorado: Lynne Rienner.
Schneiberg, Marc and Michael Lounsbury. 2017. “Social Movements and Institutional Analysis.” The Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 648–670.
Schneiberg, Marc, and Sarah Soule. 2015. “Institutionalization as a Contested, Multi-level Process: Politics, Social Movements and Rate Regulation in American Fire Insurance.” In Social Movements and Organizations, ed. Gerald Davis, Doug McAdam, W. R. Scott, and Mayer Zald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–160.
Schock, Kurt. 2015. Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schofield, Norman. 1977. “Transitivity of Preferences on a Smooth Manifold of Alternatives.” Journal of Economic Theory 14 (1): 149–171.
Sharp, Gene. 2015. Waging Nonviolent Struggle: 20th Century Practice and 21st Century Potential. Boston, MA: Extending Horizons Books.
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. “Discretion, Institutions, and the Problem of Government Commitment.” In Social Theory for a Changing Society, ed. P. Bourdieu and J. Coleman. Boulder: Westview Press.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104.
—. 1995. “Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions.” In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, ed. Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Soule, Sarah A. and Susan Olzak. 2014. “When do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review 69(4): 473–497.
Staton, Jeffrey and Georg Vanberg. 2018. “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 504–519.
Stokes, Susan. 2015. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 315–325.
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Tucker, Joshua A. 2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-communist Colored Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5(3): 535–551.
Walter, Barbara. 2012. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ward, Michael D., Andreas Beger, Josh Cutler, Matthew Dickenson, Cassy Dorff, and Ben Radford. 2013. “Comparing GDELT and ICEWS Event Data.” WardLab Report, 13 October. Available at http://mdwardlab.com/sites/default/files/GDELTICEWS_0.pdf.
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (June): 245–263
Weingast, Barry and William Marshall. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96: 132.
Wisler, Dominique and Marco G. Giugni. 1996. “Social Movements and Institutional Selectivity.” Sociological Review 39(1): 85–109.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Olugbenga Charles Adewale, Bimbo Ogunbanjo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.