Ideology of ISIS

Social and Linguistic Practices of Abu Bakkar Al Baghdadi’s First speech

Authors

  • Manal Ni’met Abdulhadi College of Arts / Mustansiriyah University/ Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i132.806

Keywords:

ideology, CDA, discursive practices, figures of speech

Abstract

To the best of the researcher’s knowledge many studies (e.g., Bunzel: 2015) have been conducted studying the social practices of ISIS discourse only. Others (e.g, Buckingham, and Alali: 2019) focus upon the linguistic aspects of that discourse. The present paper aims at filling this gap by investigating both the social and the linguistic elements that characterize ISIS ideology. The present study focuses on analyzing the first speech delivered by Abu Bakkar Al Baghdadi in 2014 through implementing critical discourse analysis methodologies. The objective of this analysis is to outline the ideology of ISIS through exploring the critical social and cultural aspects together with the linguistic features in the text under investigation. The study will adopt an eclectic model of analysis and research based on Fairclough's (1992) principles of critical discourse analysis and Van Dijik’s ( 1980) framework of semantic structures (topics). Both global and local semantics are studied so as to relate social to linguistic practices and vise versa. The results of the research show that this speech has a distinctive tactic language that is full of figures of speech, in particular euphemism and dysphemism that help the speaker transfer his intended ideologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Baghdadi, A. B. (2014). A Message to the Mujahidin and the Muslim Ummah from AmirulMu’minin Abu Bakr al-Husayni al-Qurashi al-Baghdadi. Al-Hayat Media Center. Available at: https://ia902501.us.archive.org/2/items/hym3_22aw/english.pdf
Al-Hamad, M. Q. & Al-Shunnaq, M. A. (2011). Emotive expressions in President Al-Assad's Political Speeches. Onomazein, 23(1), 149-170.
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and Dysphemism: language used as shield and weapon, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo an the censoring of language. New York: Cambridge University Press
Batstone, R. (1995) Grammar in discourse: Attitude and deniability. In G.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University press
Buckingham, L. and Alali, N. (2019). Extreme parallels: a corpus- driven analysis of ISIS and far- right discourse: Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. UK: Routledge.
Bunzel, C. (2015). From Paper State to Caliphate: The Ideology of the Islamic State. The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World Analysis Paper
Cook and B Seidlhofer, (eds.) Principle & Practice in Applied Linguistics (pp. 197-213). Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Language and Social Change. London: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketisation of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-84). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London, UK: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hussein, A. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis of the Political Speech of the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, at the New Suez Canal Inauguration Ceremony. International Journal of Language and Literature. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 85-106 Palgrave, pp. 1–42.
Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew. (1979). Language and Control. London:Routledge & KeganPaul, 1979. 224 pp.
Samoskaite, L. (2011). 21st Century Political Euphemisms in English Newspapers: Semantic and Structural Study. Vilnius Pedagogical University Press. Lithuania
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Coherence. Text and Context: Exploration in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman
Van Dijk, Teun. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-83.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2006. “Discourse, context and cognition”. Discourse Studies 8(1)
Walli, Jamil. (2015) The psychology of detachment and hyperreality: Analyzing ISIL`s propaganda. Sweden: Linnaeus University
Wodak, Ruth (2008). Introduction: terms and concepts. In Ruth, Wodak & Michał, Krzyz˙anowski (Eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke:
Wodak, Ruth (Ed.) (1989) Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth. (1995). Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In J. Verschueren, J-O Ostman & J. Blommart (Eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-15

Issue

Section

Other studies

How to Cite

Ideology of ISIS: Social and Linguistic Practices of Abu Bakkar Al Baghdadi’s First speech. (2020). Al-Adab Journal, 2(132), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i132.806

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

1-10 of 180

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.