Adjectives in Shakespeare's Sonnets

A Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Nagham Ali Hassan Department of Environmental Engineering/ College of Engineering/ University of Baghdad/ Baghdad/ Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i142.3607

Keywords:

Adjectives, Compound adjectives, discourse Analysis, Sonnets, Stylistics analysis

Abstract

The present paper studies the use of adjectives in Shakespeare's Sonnets (4, 5, 6, & 9), which are chosen randomly, on the three levels: grammar, lexis and conversation. It tackles adjectives as a literary term with presenting their forms and functions. The presentation is done according to the themes, their forms and functions in conversation, the adjectives are shown in this paper as for their forms, frequency and meanings in the sonnets and their effects on studying. The analysis is done according to Quirk et al. (1985) and Quirk and Greenbaum (1973). Then, all adjectives have been calculated in the sonnets. The results of the analysis have shown that compound adjectives which occurred (31) are used more than the Suffixation and Prefixation as (13) and (8) respectively. The paper shows that there is a clear relation between adjectives and the thematic structure of the sonnets. The presentation of adjectives proves Shakespeare's witty ways to use them in a method that equals various themes. Moreover, they are used precisely and accurately to transmit themes and have pedagogical effects in conversation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, V. (1973). An Introduction to Modern English Word-formation. London: Longman Group Ltd Bauer.

Babajide, A. (2000). Of Style and Linguistics Studies in England Language. Enicrownfit publisher, Ilbadan

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt

Brich, D. (1989). Language, Literature and Critical Practice. London: Routldge.

Candlin (1989). Stylistics. London: Longman Group Limited

Carter, R. (1988). What is Stylistics and Why Can We Teach It in Different Ways? In M. Short (ed) Reading Analyzing and Teaching Literature. London: Longman.

Flowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: OUP.

Lawal, R. (1997). Pragmatics in Stylistics: A Speech-Act Analysis of Soyinka's Telephone Conversation. R.A. Lawal (ed) Stylistics in Theory and Practice, Ilorin: Paragan books.

Leech, G and Short, M. (1981). Style in Fiction: a Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.

Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.

Quirk, R & Sidney, G. (1973). A University Grammar of English. London: Longman Group Limited.

Quirk, R, Sidney G, Geoffrey L, & Jan S. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman Group Limited.

Shaw, H. (1972). Dictionary of Literary Terms. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Short, M & Candlin, C. (1989). Teacing, Study skills for English Literature in Reading, Analyzing and teaching Literature. London: Longman.

Short, M. (1981). English Sentences. New York: New American Library.

Thomas, T. (2007). “Shakespeare's Sonnets". New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Widdowson, H. (1975). Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature. London: Longman.

Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2019)."English Compound".(2020, January 18) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

Wikipedia. English_compound. (2020, January 18) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.

Wikipedia. English_compound. (2020, January 18) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-15

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Hassan, N. A. (2022). Adjectives in Shakespeare’s Sonnets: A Discourse Analysis. Al-Adab Journal, 1(142), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i142.3607

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

1-10 of 416

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.