The Critical Period Hypothesisin Second Language Acquisition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i123.160Keywords:
critical period, second language acquisition, language proficiency.Abstract
This paper discusses one of the most appealing subjects that is of interest to learners, educators, scholars, and researchers around the world. Researchers in linguistics, cognitive science, psychology, and neurology paid a good deal of attention to the decline in the level of language proficiency that starts around a certain age and what may cause that decline after the end of that period. Many of them called it a critical period. In the following pages we are trying to shed light on this theory in an endeavor to look for factors influencing language acquisition bynew language learners. There is a clear uncertainty about factors that have an effect on second language acquisition. This paper aims to review the literature that approached this critical period hypothesis (CPH) and to draw conclusions related to the topic.
Downloads
References
Bettoni-Techio, M. (2008).State of the art discussion on the influence of age on SLA. Todas As Letras: Revista De Língua E Literatura,10, 68-73.
Birdsong, D. (Ed.). (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Birdsong, D., &Molis, M. (2001).On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition.Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.
Birdsong, D. (2005). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 319-328.
Bongaerts, T. (2005). Introduction: Ultimate attainment and the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 259-267.
Bongaerts, T. et al. (1997) Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447-465.
Bornstein, M.H. (1989). Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 179–197.
Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2008). A test of the critical period hypothesis for language
learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29, 16-29. Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colombo, J. (1982). The critical period concept: Research, methodological, and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 260–275.
Du, L. (2010). Assess the critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition. English Language Teaching, 3, 219-224.
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second
language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101-131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flege, J.E., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995).Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.
Gass, S. M. &Selinker, L. (2001).Second language acquisition: an introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Han, Z. (2008). Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition (1st ed.) Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. pp. 44-176.
Hakuta, K. K., Bialystok, E. E., & Wiley, E. E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical–period hypothesis for second–language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31-38.
Harley, B. & Wang, W. (1997). “The critical period hypothesis: Where are we now?”.In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 19–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hurford, J. R. (1991). The evolution of the critical period in language acquisition.Cognition, 40, 159-201.
Hyltenstam, K. &Abrahamsson, N. (2003).“Maturational constraints in SLA”.In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215–258.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.
Nikolov, M &Djigunovic, J. M. (2006).Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,26, 234-260.
Penfield, W. & Roberts, L. (1959).Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Singleton, D. &Lengyel, Z. (Eds.) (1995).The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition : A critical look at the critical period hypothesis. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Snow, C. E., &Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114-1128.
Stevens, G. (2004). Commentary using census data to test the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 15, 215-216.
Stowe, L. A., &Sabourin, L. (2005).Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,43(4), 329-353.
Tokudome, M. (2010). Unlikely bedfellows: The critical period hypothesis and its effects on second language acquisition. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 14, 18-27.
Wiley, E. W., Bialystok, E., &Hakuta, K. (2005).New approaches to using census data to test the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 16, 341-343.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.