Six-Factor Model Of Psychological Well-Being in College students

Authors

  • Sara Hassan Salman Al-Mustansiriya University- College of Education
  • Majida Hillel Al-Ali Al-Mustansiriya University / College of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i137.1100

Keywords:

Rosemry, Six-Factor Model Of Psychological Well-Being, university students

Abstract

The research aimed identify (Six-Factor Model Of Psychological Well-Being) the Relational descriptive method adopted, and the research sample consists of (400) male and female students from AL-Mustansiriyah University from both specialization (scientific and humanistic) for the academic year (2019-2020) and about (177) students from scientific specialize and (223) from humanistic students and about (202) from male and (198) from female. And the research used (Rosemry A Abbott, al 2006) scale adopted of Six-Factor Model Of  Psychological Well-Being to university students according to Ryff theory, which consists of (42) position for(Measuring Six-Factor Model Of Psychological Well-Being) and it's a Likert Scale and its contain five Alternatives(Always , Often , Sometimes , Rarely, Never) and the score of response where(5,4,3,2,1) where the score (1) for the fifth answer and the score (2) for the forth answer and the score (3) for the third answer and the score (4) for the second answer and the score (5) for the first answer and that the highest possible score for the respondent is (175) and the lowest score is (35), with a hypothetical mean (105)..

And the research results achieved The mostly used factor of Psychological Well-being Among university students is the Autonomy and it followed by two factors Environmental Mastery and Positive Relation with Others and less used factors is Personal Growth, Purpose in Life and Self-Acceptance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff's psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women.

being. Journal of happiness studies, 9(1), 13-39.

Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2003). Attributional style and self-esteem as predictors of psychological well being. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 121-130.

Cooke, R., Bewick, B. M., Barkham, M., Bradley, M., & Audin, K. (2006). Measuring, monitoring and managing the psychological well-being of first year university students. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34(4), 505-517.

Furr, R. M. (2005). Differentiating happiness and self-esteem. Individual differences research, 3(2).

Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Harwood, J., Lewis, C. A., & McCollam, P. (2004). Rapid assessment of well‐being: The short depression‐happiness scale (SDHS). Psychology and psychotherapy: Theory, research and practice, 77(4), 463-478.

Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 181-187.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.

Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current directions in psychological science, 4(4), 99-104.

Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-

Spence, O (2004). Goal of self integration and happiness. Journal of P. Peter, personality and individual Differences 37 (3): 441-461.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-15

Issue

Section

Educational and psychological sciences

How to Cite

Salman, S. H., & Al-Ali, M. H. (2021). Six-Factor Model Of Psychological Well-Being in College students. Al-Adab Journal, 2(137), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i137.1100

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

31-40 of 1585

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.