The Impact of Developing the EFL University Students' Awareness in the Use of Pragmatic Markers on their Essay Writing ability

  • Walaa Jabbar Katti University of Garmian / College of languages and Human Sciences Department of English Language
Keywords: Writing, EFL, Students


Writing is not only employs the procedure of a good written text, but depicts and values the coherence as well as the cohesion, too. Composing a lot of sentences without considering the cohesive ties fails to negotiate the inter-related events intended to be decoded by the reader. Then the presence of text markers is a necessary condition to have a smooth and enjoyable written text. Thus, writing a good essay needs the mastery of choosing the suitable pragmatic markers. Pragmatic markers, according to many writers, are a crucial part of learners' strategic competence. However, Pragmatic markers comprise a functional class of linguistic items that do not typically change the propositional meaning of an utterance but are essential for the organization and structuring of discourse, for marking the writer’s attitudes to the proposition being expressed as well as for facilitating processes of pragmatic inferences. Pragmatic markers have been seen as set of syntactically diverse linguistic items (for example, of course, surely, quite frankly, incidentally, thus, well and so on).

   Thus, the essence of this study is to examine the students' performance in the use of the pragmatic markers. It also aims to investigate the effects of developing the pragmatic markers on their essay writing abilities. In addition, the present study intends to answer the following questions: How is the performance of the students in essay writing? What is the difference between the experimental group who will achieve the treatment sessions during the present experiment and the control group who will held back to receive such a treatment? What are the significant relationship between developing students' awareness in the use of pragmatic markers and their essay writing ability?


Download data is not yet available.


Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: a Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bach, K & R. Harnish. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. MIT Press.
Blakemore, D. . (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blakemore, D. (1992). Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blakemore, D. (2008). Discourse Markers. In R. L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The
handbook of pragmatics (pp. 221-240). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Brown, P & S. Levinson (1987) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feng, L. (2010). Discourse Markers in English Writing. Journal of International Social Research, Vol. 3/11, Spring 2010.
Fraser, Bruce. (1990). An approach to Discourse Markers. Journal of linguistics 14.
Fraser, Bruce. (1991). Perspectives on Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics14.
Fraser, Bruce. (1996). Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190.
Fraser, B. (1999). What are Discourse Markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931-952.
Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and
Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings. Applied Linguistics, 28, 410-439.
Gay, L. R. & Geoffrey E.M. (2010) Educational Research. Competencies for Analysis and Application. Columbus: Prentice Hall.
Good, Thomas L. and Colin N. Power (1976). The Effect of Teaching: an Optimistic Note. The Elementary School Journal. Vol. 76, No. 6.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (2007). Language Which is not Taught: The Discourse
Marker Use of Beginning Adult Learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics,
39, 157-179.
Hasselgreen, A. (2004). Testing the Spoken English of Young Norwegians: A studyof test validity and the role of "smallwords" in contributing to pupils' fluency.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic Transfer. Second Language Research, 8(3), 203-231.
McCarthy, M. J., & Carter, R.A. (1995). Spoken Grammar: What is it and How Can We Teach it? English Language Teaching Journal, 49(3), 207-218.
Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (1997). Fostering Pragmatic Awareness. Applied Language
Learning, 10(1), 1-14.
Romero-Trillo, J. (2002). The pragmatic Fossilization of Discourse Markers in
non- Native Speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 769-784.
Romero-Trillo, J. (2012). Pragmatic Markers. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 120-158.
Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse Markers. Lingua, 107(3-4), 227-265.
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The Development of Fluency in Advanced Learners of French. Applied linguistics, 17, 84-119.
VanPattern, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
How to Cite
Katti, W. (2020). The Impact of Developing the EFL University Students’ Awareness in the Use of Pragmatic Markers on their Essay Writing ability. Al-Adab Journal (ISSN: 1994473X), (133), 93-116. Retrieved from
English linguistics and literature