An Image Schema Theoretic Analysis of None-Literal Meanings of Prepositions in English and Arabic Religious Texts

Authors

  • Sahar Nuhad Mohammad University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Dept. of English
  • Prof. Mahdi I. Kareem University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Dept. of English

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/mt9af862

Keywords:

Cognitive linguistics, Cognitive grammar, Image schema, Prepositions

Abstract

This paper investigates the non-literal meanings of prepositions in English and Arabic religious texts, focusing on how image schemas shape these meanings. Prepositions are widely used in religious discourse, literally and nonliterally according to the contexts in which they are used. When a preposition is used metaphorically, its intended meaning may not be immediately clear to readers; this can lead to misunderstanding and ambiguity. This paper aims to address this gap by examining how prepositions in both English and Arabic convey not only literal spatial relations but also abstract, cultural, and religious concepts. This paper explores the cognitive mechanisms underlying prepositional usage, revealing the role of embodied experiences and conceptual structures in interpreting spatial and metaphorical relationships. To achieve the objectives of this paper, selected instances from the Holy New Testament Bible and the Glorious Quran are analyzed in light of Johnson's (1987) image schema theory as the model of the cognitive approach. The study highlights the significance of these prepositions extension in shaping the interpretation of the texts and clarifying the intended meanings of the verses. The findings suggest the image schemas used in both languages show similarities; cultural and conceptual differences lead to unique applications of these schemas. English typically uses more abstract and dynamic frames, whereas Arabic generally relies on concrete and relational frames.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aajami, R. F. (2018). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Enhance the Semantics of English at: An Experimental Study (Baghdad University). International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(6), 185-192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n6p185

Aajami, R.F. (2022). A cognitive linguistic study of the English prepositions above, on, and over. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 738-751. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.216

Al-Samarrai, F. S. (2000). Meanings of Grammar. Dar Al-Fikr for Printing and Publishing.

Alshammari, M. (2017). Spatial prepositions in Arabic and English.

al-Ubaidy S.M. & al-Utbi M. I.K. (2012). Identification and Analysis of Terrorism Metaphors. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, (200).

BibleGateway.com: A searchable online Bible in over 150 versions and 50 languages.

Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6

Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (2009). Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631421

Crystal, D. (2018). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge university press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108528931

Esseesy, M. (2010). Grammaticalization of Arabic prepositions and subordinators: A corpus-based study. In Grammaticalization of Arabic Prepositions and Subordinators. Brill DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004187634

Gharab, A. M. (2020). A cognitive linguistic study of image schemata in selected English proverbs. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(39), 717-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol1.Iss39.1358

Hasan Abdullah, A. (2019). The Semantic Extension of Some Arabic Prepositions in the Holy Quran with Reference to their Effect on English Interpretations. Journal of The Iraqi University.

https://www.merriam-webster.com , Cambridge Dictionary | English Dictionary, Translations & Thesaurus

Husni, R., & Zaher, A. (2020). Working with Arabic Prepositions: Structures and Functions (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099101-1

Jabber, K. W., & Fahid, A. M. (2018). A cognitive linguistic study of up and down in Iraqi Arabic. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), (37), 125-144.

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. United Kingdom: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001

Khan, S., & Ali, R. (2017). A Cognitive-Semantic Study of the Spatial Preposition Fī (ﻲِﻓ) in the Quran.

Khan, S., Badshah, S. N., & Khan, I. U. (2019). Cognitive semantic study of the preposition ‘Min’in the quran. Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies, 4(2), 83-110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36476/JIRS.4:2.12.2019.13

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction (Vol.535). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English prepositions explained. English Prepositions Explained, 1-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.157

Nadeau, S. E. (2012). The neural architecture of grammar. MIT press.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017022.001.0001

Naser, H. S., & Mohammed, A. B. (2020). The Persuasive Power of Religious Metaphor in Selected Qur’anic and Biblical Verses: Ontological, Structural and Orientational. Al-Adab Journal, (135), 11-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i135.816

Nasser, S. M. (2020). A Cognitive-Semantic Analysis of Preposition on: An Experimental Study at University of Baghdad . Arab World English Journal, 11 (3) 493 -501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.32

Neary, C. (2014). Profiling the flight of ‘The Windhover’. Cognitive Grammar in Literature, 17, 119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.17.08nea

Newman, J. (2011). Cognitive Grammar

Risch, J. S. (2008). On the role of metaphor in information visualization. arXiv preprint arXiv:0809.0884.

Saeed, J. I. (2011). Semantics. Germany: Wiley.

Sangoor, M. (2023). USING COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS TO TEACH SYNONYMS FOR IRAQI COLLEGE STUDENTS. Al-Adab Journal, (147), 21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i147.4146

Sardaraz, K., Rashid, R. A., & Nusrat, A. (2022). The Semantics of the Preposition “alā” in the Quran: A Conceptual Metaphor Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 788582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.788582

Semino, E., & Demjén, Z. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672953

Srieh, A. T., & al-Utbi, M. I. K. (2021). A Cognitive Stylistic Analysis of Characterization in Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Alustath, 60(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v60i1.1287

Subianto, P. (2019). Image Schema Analysis on Psalm 23: A Study of Metaphor Based on Cognitive Theory.” e. Journal of Linguistics, 13, 86-92.

Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517

Wang, C. (2020). Implicit Cognitive Meanings of the Spatial Prepositions in, on, and at in English. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(2), 70-83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v1i2.33

Zare, A. (2023). The role of cognitive metaphor in the formation and presentation of Imam Ali’s Ideological System in Nahj al-Balagha: The analysis of the conceptual metaphors: THE WORLD IS AN INFERIOR, DETESTABLE OBJECT as examples. Al-Adab Journal, (147), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i147.4128

Zhang, X. (2021). Development and critiques of conceptual metaphor theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(11), 1487-1491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1111.18

Zhu, T. (2023). The Spatial Metaphor of English Preposition based on Image Schema. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 61-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v3i3.4467

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Mohammad, S., & Kareem, M. (2026). An Image Schema Theoretic Analysis of None-Literal Meanings of Prepositions in English and Arabic Religious Texts. Al-Adab Journal, 68(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.31973/mt9af862

Publication Dates

Received

2025-02-03

Revised

2025-02-24

Accepted

2025-02-26

Published Online First

2026-03-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 292

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.