Gender Difference of Politeness Strategies Through Online Chatting Experienced by EFL Students in Al-Anbar Distinguished Schools

Authors

  • Baydaa Subhi Hamood Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University Of Anbar, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq
  • Ala’a Ismael Challob Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University Of Anbar, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i144.4050

Keywords:

Gender, Politeness strategies, Online chatting, EFL Students, Al-Anbar Distinguished Schools

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify the differences between male and female politeness strategies employed by Iraqi EFL students in Al-Anbar Distinguished Schools. To attain this aims, the participants of the study were selected from Al-Anbar Distinguished Schools, represented by 53 female students and 50 male students during the academic year (2021-2022) to be in direct and frequent online interaction (via text messages) with each other as students, and with their teachers of English language. Consequently, WhatsApp and Telegram groups were created for this online chatting. A qualitative research design was conducted whereby online text chatting was collected to ensure the data of this study. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively by using content analysis procedure based on Brown’s and Levisohn’s (1987) model of politeness strategies. The findings showed that there were differences between males and females’ use of politeness strategies as female students used these strategies slightly more than male students. It is worth noting that female students have used negative politeness strategies more than male students. Accordingly, teachers and students’ parents must educate students about how to use these strategies properly in communication especially via online chatting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Baydaa Subhi Hamood, Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University Of Anbar, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq

    Graduate student

  • Ala’a Ismael Challob, Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University Of Anbar, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq

    Research supervisor

References

Ammaida, Yunisaa.(2020). Politeness Strategies of the Comments Toward Trump’s Instagram Post on International Women’s Day. Fakultas Adab dan Bahasa IAIN Surakarta.

Arif, Novianti and et al.(2018). Male and Female Lecturers‟ Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI) Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 28-39.

Brown, P., & Levisohn, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics And Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Dimitrova-Galaczi, E. (2002). Issues in The Definition and Conceptualization of Politeness. Columbia University: TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2.1, 1-20.

Kadar, Daniel Z. & Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca.(2011). Institutional Politeness in (South) East Asia. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication.

Kumar, Ritesh.(2011). A Politeness Recognition Tool for Hindi. India: Hyderabad.

Kurniyatin. (2017). An Analysis of Politeness Strategies used by Teacher and Students in English Class at MTs NU AssalamKudus. Thesis. Surakarta: State Islamic Institute of Surakarta.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Morse, J.M.(2000). Determining Sample Size. Qualitative Health Research. Vol.10, n. 1.

Muhasibi, Ann Nazila.(2020). Politeness Strategies Used by Teacher and Students on Online English Teaching Learning Process at SMP N 2 Tanon, Sragen in Academic Year 2020/2021. The State Islamic Institute of Surakarta.

AbdulGhafoor, Najla Hais and Challob, Ala'a Ismael (2021). The Influence of Using Online Discussion on Developing EFL Students’ Grammar Knowledge. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21: 837-855.

Oktaviani, Fitri and Laturrakhmi, Yun.(2013). Degradation of Politeness: Social Media’s Fault. The International Academic Forum.

Pridham, F. (2001). The Language of Conversation. London: Routledge.

Rahmat, Nur Rahmi.(2020). An Analysis Of Students’ Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom Interaction.

Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford introductions to language study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Syafrizal, Syafrizal and Putri, Fianika Syabana.(2020). Linguistic Politeness: An Analysis of Gender Differences in Speaking Classroom. Journal of English Teaching and Research, volume: 5, number: 2.

Tohirin, M. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Pendikan dan Bimbigan Konseling. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Warsito, Seno. (2013). Politeness Strategies in Teacher’s Student Interaction in the EFL Classroom Context. IKIP PGRI Semarang.

Yulia, M. F. (2016). Politeness Issues in Communication over Text Messages. In Proceedings of The Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-15

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Gender Difference of Politeness Strategies Through Online Chatting Experienced by EFL Students in Al-Anbar Distinguished Schools. (2023). Al-Adab Journal, 2(144), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i144.4050

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1626

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.