Class-home Connection Using Communication Technology and its Impact on Anxiety Reduction and Academic Performance

  • Liqaa Habeb Al-Obaydi University of Diyala, college of education for humanities, Iraq
  • Zainab Abbas Jawad University of Diyala, college of education for humanities, Iraq
  • Fathu Rahman Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
Keywords: Class-home Connection, Communication Technology, Academic Performance, Anxiety Reduction

Abstract

This study tries to shed light on the importance of using communication technology in class-home connection, where the two-way communication that requires electronic interactive dialogue between teachers and parents are used, and how this communication may enhance students’ English language academic performance and help in reducing their classroom anxiety. The sample of the study consists of thirty EFL secondary school students with their parents. Two instruments were used to collect data; structured interview with parents, observation checklists to measure students’ anxiety, in addition to use students’ academic performance to determine their level of achievement in English. The results show that parents have positive attitudes towards using communication technology in class-home connection. It further demonstrates that students’ level of anxiety was reduced notably after applying the experiment, when the parents connect with the teacher daily, in addition to palpable improvement in students’ academic performance in English language. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2019). Teaching and Learning English in EFL Context: Blended Learning is the Choice. Inspire. Retrieved from https://inspire.jpik.com/teaching-and-learning-english-in-efl-context-blended-learning-is-the-choice/

Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2017). The impact of using PowerPoint presentation on EFL students’attendance, achievement, and engagement. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL) Mağallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Luġāt, 35(2), 39-61.

Berger, E. H. (1991). Parents as partners in education: the school and home working together. New York: Macmillan.

Brewer, W. R., & Kallick, B. (1996). Technology’s promise for reporting student learning. In Communicating student learning: 1996 ASCD yearbook (pp. 178-187). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, USA.

Cameron, C. A., & Lee, K. (1997). Bridging the gap between home and school with voicemail technology. Journal of Educational Research, 90(3), 182-191.

Carr, N. (2012). Using technology for school communications: GCS doctoral cohort survey 2012: Analysis and implications, recommendations, tools. Retrieved from https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=18072

Cary, A. O. (2006). How strong communication contributes to student and school success: Parent and family involvement. Rockville, MD: The National School Public Relations Association

Caspe, M. S. (2003). How teachers come to understand families. School Community Journal, 13(1), 115-131.

Epstein, Joyce (1992). School and family partnerships. In Marvin Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research, (6th edition, pp.1139-1151). New York: MacMillan.

Giannetti, C. C., & Sagarese, M. M. (1998). Turning parents from critics into allies. Educational Leadership, 55(8), 40-42.

Gregersen, T. S. (2003). To Err Is Human: A Reminder to Teachers of Language-Anxious Students. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 1, 25-32.

Hayes, H. (2011). Predicting parental home and school involvement in high school African American adolescents. The High School Journal, 94(4), 154-166.

Heath, D., Maghrabi, R., & Carr, N. (2015). Implications of information and communication technologies (ICT) for school-home communication. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 363-396. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol14/JITEv14ResearchP363-395Heath1876.pdf

Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126.

Hussain, K. (2020). Iraqi Preparotory Schools Teachers’' Attitudes Toward Using Communicative Approach as a Teaching Method for '' Iraq Opportunities Textbook”. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol. No. 10, Issue No. II.

Ivanova, E. & Doncheva, J. (2019). Building a new alternative level of partnership with parents through internet communications. 11th International Conference on education and new learning technologies, 1-3 July, 2019. Palma, Spain.

Jawad, Z. & Abdul Mahdi, A. (2019). Investigating college students’ attitudes towards mobile learning. 10th International Scientific Conference of College of Education for Humanities/ University of Diyala Diyala/Iraq 10-11 April 2019.

Jawad, Z. A. & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2015). Investigating the Effect of Language Anxiety on Student-Teachers’ Oral Performance. The Eighth Scientific Conference of the College of Education for Human Science/University of Diyala/ 2015 Iraq/Diyala

Johnson, E., & Johnson, A. (2016). / Enhancing Academic Investment through Home-School Connections. Journal of Language and Literacy Education Vol. 12 Issue 1-Spring 2016 http://jolle.coe.uga.edu

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kannan, R. (2009). Difficulties in learning English as a Second Language, ESP World,8, 5 (26): 1-4.

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickulu, K (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Retrieved from Pew Internet & American Life site: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/oldmedia/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report _Final_with_toplines.pdf

Murphy, T. (2013). An evaluation of home-school partnership relations developed in designated disadvantaged (DEIS) post-primary schools to enhance students’ literacy and numeracy. DEd Thesis. Retrieved from http://doras.dcu.ie

Pavlik, J. V. (2007). Mapping the consequences of technology on public relations. Retrieved from http://www.instituteforpr.org/mapping-technology-consequences/

Ramirez, F. (2001). Technology and parent involvement. Clearing House, 75(1), 30-31.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Salend, S. J., Duhaney, D., Anderson, D. J., & Gottschalk, C. (2004). Using the internet to improve homework communication and completion. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 64-73.

Springston, J. K. (2001). Public relations and new media technology: The impact of the internet. Handbook of Public Relations, 583-589, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Wright, D. K. (2001). The magic communication machine: examining the Internet’s impact on public relations, journalism, and the public. Retrieved from http://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2001_InternetImpact.pdf

Yıldırım, A. & Gansinger, Martin A. M. (2018). Vortex of the Web. Potentials of the online environment. In Gansinger, Martin A . M. & Kole, A. The juxtaposition effect of online communication on social environments, including gender discrimination and political opinion. (pp.41-60). Germany: Anchor Academic Publishing.

Published
2022-06-15
How to Cite
Al-Obaydi, L., Jawad, Z., & Rahman, F. (2022). Class-home Connection Using Communication Technology and its Impact on Anxiety Reduction and Academic Performance. Al-Adab Journal, 1(141), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i141.3615
Section
Educational and psychological sciences