USING COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS TO TEACH SYNONYMS FOR IRAQI COLLEGE STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i147.4146Keywords:
Lexical Concept, Cognitive Linguistics, Synonyms, Theory of DomainAbstract
It's challenging to help EFL students in Iraq learn and use synonyms. This study investigates the challenges faced by Iraqi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students in understanding and employing synonyms. By employing Langacker's cognitive linguistic theory of domains, the research aims to enhance EFL Iraqi students' synonym knowledge and vocabulary acquisition. The study utilizes a descriptive analysis technique, with a pre-test and post-test design, involving fifty first-year students at the University of Baghdad's College of Languages, Department of English. The findings reveal that the domain theory significantly improved students' comprehension and application of English word semantics. Prior to the intervention, students had limited knowledge of the domain approach and struggled with recognizing and producing lexical features. After five weeks of treatment, students demonstrated increased abilities to define different types of domains and their properties, as well as understanding the literal and conceptual meanings of words. The study concludes that implementing the theory of domains can effectively enhance vocabulary acquisition among Iraqi EFL students and emphasizes the importance of teaching synonyms with a focus on sense relations.
Downloads
References
Aajami, R. F. (2019). A Cognitive Semantic Analysis of How Meanings Fit Together. Volume 10 Number 1 of the Arab World English Journal (AWEJ).
Abbasian, G., & Biria, R. (2017). The Effect of English Language Learning on Iraqi EFL Learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(7), 232-240.
Abbasian, R., Biria, R. (2017). How well do English language textbooks help students learn about national, international, and target cultures? Khazar
Afghari, A., & Khayatan, P. (2017). Collaborative Learning and Iranians Learning English
Ahmed, S. S., & Al-Ali, A. A. (2020). The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge on Reading Comprehension of EFL Learners in Iraq. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 105-115.
Alanazi, M. (2017). On how Arabic-speaking EFL learners come up with synonyms. Vol. 7, No. 3 of the International Journal of English Linguistics.
Al-Hebaishi, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Explicit Vocabulary Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 325-338.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.20
doi:10.5539/ijel.v7n3p17 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.11 I.V. Arnold, Jr. (1986). Modern English Language Lexicology (3rd Ed.). Moscow.
Edmonds, P., and G. Hirst (2002). Near-synonymy and word choice are important. Computational Linguistics, 28(2), pages 105-144. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760173625
Evans, V. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics Glossary. University of Utah Press is in Salt Lake City.
Evans, V., and Green, M., "Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction," was published in 2006. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Fatah, A. H., Mustafa, K. R. (2018). Nominal Grounding Element in English: A Domainbased Account. Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani-Part B/for Humanities. No. 53 (January 2018)
Hamawand, Z. (2011). English Morphology: How Words Are Made in Cognitive Grammar. Continuum International Publishing Group, London.
Jalilifar, A., Kheirzadeh, S., & Darabi, P. (2018). Cognitive linguistics and teaching of idioms: A review of research. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(5), 993-1003.
Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, DOI: 10.5782/22232621.2017.20.2.49
Kadhum, S. F. (2017). Textual Architecture of a Selected Hard News in English: A Discourse Analysis Approach. Arab World English Journal, 8 (1).
Khalaf, S. S. (2019). The Role of Cognitive Linguistics in English Vocabulary Acquisition. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(29), 47-54.
Khazaal, E. N. (2019). Examining and analysing the mistakes that ESP college students make when using synonyms. International Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 9, No. 5; 10.5539/ijel.v9n5p328
Krebt, D. M. (2017). An Evaluation of How Well Iraqi EFL Learners Use Synonyms and Antonyms. Volume 8, Number 2 of the Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.13
Langacker, R.W.'s book Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites came out in 1987. (1st Vols). Stanford: University of Stanford Press.
Liu, D. (2013). (2013). Salience and construal in the use of synonymy: A study of two sets of nouns that are almost the same. Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 24, Pages 67 to 113. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog2013-0003
Liu, D., & Zhong, S. (2014). An empirical study of how people use and learn synonyms in their first and second languages. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), p. 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu022 I. Lowe's Domain Theory of Language was published in 2008 by SIL International with pages 1–43.
Nasser,S. (2020). A Cognitive-Semantic Analysis of Preposition on: An Experimental Study at University of Bagdad. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Vol.11.
Saito, K. (2021). Teaching English as an International Language. In S. May (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd ed., pp. 1-12). Springer.
Soleimani, H., Shamsaee, M., & Mirzaee, M. (2021). Enhancing English Vocabulary Learning and Retention: The Effect of Technology-Enhanced Instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(2), 309-321.
Using the Snowball and Word-Webbing Methods to Improve Your Vocabulary. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 5(2), p. 122–131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mareb Albaidhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.