The Rule of the Entrepreneurship in Social Change
Research in Social Anthropology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i147.4490Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, Innovator, EntrepreneurAbstract
Social processes as a model of interaction tend towards standardization over time. Thus, temporal change and continuity are constant and fundamental features of the human condition. From this perspective, the typical use of the concept of change) applied only when the normal situation changes radically and rapidly ( involves several troubling claims, including the idea that stagnation is natural and that only change needs to be explained. In fact, the alternative is to think of our main topics, including society, culture, and nature, as a process that unfolds over time, and to show the changes that have occurred in them. Social anthropologists have always understood any human activity as closely linked to all other aspects of human existence (and vice versa). If we want to understand social change, we need concepts that allow us to monitor and describe change events. Entrepreneurship is one of the most important concepts that plays a major role in explaining the dynamics of societies, as it is the primary material for understanding these processes. The argument in this paper is that the concept of entrepreneurship is universal and the term should not be reduced to the common concept of business and legal creation. The dynamic nature of a society, or tendency to change, is often observed in the proliferation of entrepreneurs. The research seeks to understand and understand entrepreneurship and its role in bringing about processes of social change, by presenting multiple cultural perspectives on the concept, while maintaining a certain degree of clarity and precision in what the concept means... and showing the ways in which, the entrepreneur creates activities and practices that give new dynamic values to societies on the planet. Its different cultures.
Downloads
References
شارلوت سيمور سميث. (2009). موسوعة علم الانسان. (محمد د الجوهري، المترجمون) مصر: المجلس الاعلى للثقافة المشروع القومي للترجمة.
عبد الله عبد الغني غانم. (2004). التبادل وعمليات الاستثمار والادخار في المجتمع المحلي التقليدي الحضري (المجلد 2). الاسكنرية: المكتب الجامعي الحديث.
قيس د. النوري. (1989). الانثروبولوجيا الاقتصاية. الموصل: مطبعة التعليم العالي.
كلود ليفي شتراوس. (1986). الاسطورة والمعنى. (د. شاكر عبد الحميد، المترجمون) بغداد: دار الشؤون الثقافية العامة.
كلود ليفي شتراوس. (2007). الفكر البري (المجلد 3). بيروت: مجد المؤسسة الجامعية للدراسا والنشر.
Andersson, R. (2019). No Go World. California: Published by University of California Press.
Baily, F. G. (1960). Tribe, caste and nation. London: Manchester University Press.
Baily, F. G. (1969). Stratagems and Spoils. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Pavilion Series.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), p. 333.
Barnard, A., & Spencer, J. (2010). Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. London: Routledge .
Barth, F. (1963). The Role of the Entrepreneur in Social Change in Northern Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Barth, F. (1967). Economic Spheres in Darfur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barth, F. (1967). On the study of social change. American Anthropologist, Vol.(69)(No.(6)).
Bjerregaard, T., & Lauring, J. (2012). The Socially-Dynamic Entrepreneurial Process: An Anthropological Approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Vol.(4)(No.(2)), p. 137.
Cohen, A. (1969). Political anthropology: the analysis of the symbolism of power relations. Man, Vol.(4)(No.(2)), p. 233.
Drucker, P. (1993). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. US: Harper Business.
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ekelund, R., & Hebert, R. (1990). A History of Economic Thought and Method (Vol. third edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Foos, N., & Klein, P. (2004). Entrepreneurship and the Economic Theory of the Firm: Any Gains from Trade. (S. Alvarez, & O. Sorenson, Eds.) Kluwer: Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives.
Gartner , W. B. (1989). Some Suggestions for Research on Entrepreneurial Traits and Characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.(14)(No.(1)), p. 38.
Granovetter, M. (1985, first half). Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol.(91)(No.(3)), p. 488.
Gurca, A. (2016). A Bricolage Perspective on Technological Innovation in Emerging Markets. London: Loughborough University.
Isaac, B. L. (2005). Karl Polanyi. (J. G. Carrier, Ed.) Cheltenham , (UK): Edwar Elgar.
Johnson, C. (2012). Bricoleur and Bricolage: From Metaphor to Universal Concept. Scotland: Edinburgh University.
Leach, E. R. (1964). Political systems of highland Burma. A study of Kachin social structure. London: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Mambrol, N. (2016). https://literariness.orgclaude-levi-strauss-concept-of-bricolage. Retrieved from Literary Theory and Criticism.
Straus, C. L. (1969). The Raw and the Cooked. (J. a. Weightman, Trans.) New Yor: Evanston: Harper and Row.
Verver, M., Roessingh, C., & Passenier, D. (2020). Ethnic boundary dynamics in immigrant entrepreneurship: a Barthian perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, An International Journal, Vol.(32), p. 261.
Virtanen, M. (1997). The Role of Different Theories in Explaining Entrepreneurship. Journal of Best Papers of the 42nd World Conference, p. 11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 د. كرار ناصر حريب
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
