Exploring Impoliteness Strategies in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman
A Stylistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i129.587Keywords:
aesthetic function, stylistic analysis, Death of a Salesman, impoliteness strategiesAbstract
The current study is mainly intended to explore linguistic realizations of impoliteness strategies employed in speeches uttered by the characters in Death of a Salesman written by the American playwright, Arthur Miller. Occurrences of impoliteness strategies in the data are searched for and then quantitatively counted. Ninety-five impolite speeches are extracted as the data and analysed in terms of Culpeper’s model (1996) so as to unwrap the aesthetic function of language. The analysis reveals that the most dominant impolite speeches are mirrored by positive impoliteness (utilizing taboo words) which constitute 37% followed by bald impoliteness constituting 21%, negative impoliteness (invading the other’s space) constituting 9.5%, sarcasm or mock impoliteness constituting 6.32%, negative impoliteness (scorn or ridiculous) constituting 6.32%, negative impoliteness (associating the other with a negative aspect explicitly) constituting 5.3%, positive impoliteness (calling the other names) constituting 4.22%, positive impoliteness (inappropriate identity markers) and (disassociating from the others) constituting 3.17% and withhold politeness (being silent) and (failing to thank) constituting 1%, respectively. The findings show a manifestation of lack of edification and morality during the characters’ interaction. The characters’ disharmony and mutiny move the plot of the drama forward and tandem evoke the interest of the audience. Accordingly, the study significantly concludes that such characters’ unfriendly interaction, profanity and disequilibrium reflect the domestic and social severity of life and the psychological persecution due to the middle-class anxieties during the postwar II period in America which are liable to be highlighted via a thought-provoking dramatic embodiment.
Downloads
References
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John. Benjamin Publishing Company.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S, C. (1978). Politeness Some Universals in Language Usage. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, J. W. (2007). Miller: Death of a Salesman. New Delhi. Chapman Enterprises.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Griffin, A. (1996). Understanding Arthur Miller. Carolina: Carolina. University Press.
Labov, W. (2006). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locher, Miriam and Derek Bousfield (2008) ‘Introduction: Impoliteness and power in language’. In: Derek Bousfield and Miriam Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin and New York pp113.
Miller, A. (1991). Death of a Salesman. London: Longman.
Mills, S. (2005). Gender and impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 263–280.
Sell, R. D. (2005). Literary texts and diachronic aspects of politeness. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (pp. 109-130). Berlin: Mouton.
Wacewicz, S., P. Żywiczyński, and L. McCrohon (2014). Linguistic politeness from an ethological perspective: Theoretical questions and empirical issues. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 11, 81-98.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (2006). The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
