Interaction with Social Artificial Intelligence and its Relationship to Psychological Loneliness among Young People

Authors

  • Asst. Lect. Dhari Mahmoud Hatem Al-Mustansiriya University, College of Arts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/wkt86q66

Keywords:

Social artificial intelligence, psychological loneliness, university students, gender differences, social relationships

Abstract

As the influence of artificial intelligence grows in every aspect of daily life, supporters of the technology emphasize the importance of social AI in potentially alleviating the prevalence of psychological loneliness, which Pepalu & Perlman (1979) defined as an emotional state resulting from an individual’s perception of a deficiency in their social relationships, such that these relationships do not satisfy their intimate or social needs.

The present study aimed to investigate the following:

1- To examine social AI among university students

2- To investigate the significance of differences in social AI according to the gender variable.

3- To examine psychological loneliness among university students

4- To investigate the significance of differences in psychological loneliness according to the gender variable.

5-The correlation between social intelligence and psychological well-being among university students

     To achieve the above, the researcher developed a social intelligence scale based on social learning theory, comprising 16 items with five-point response options. The researcher also adopted Russell’s (Russell et al., 1978) psychological well-being scale, comprising 10 items with five-point response options. The sample consisted of 200 male and female students, from whom psychometric characteristics were extracted using SPSS software.

The present study concluded the following:

1-    University students demonstrate statistically significant interaction with social artificial intelligence.

2- There is a difference in social AI according to the gender variable, favoring females.

3- University students exhibit psychological unity, with statistical significance.

4- There is no difference in social AI according to the gender variable.

5- There is a strong correlation between social AI and psychological well-being among university students. The study concluded with a set of recommendations and proposals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

التميمي، محمود كاظم محمود(2009)، كيف تكتب بحثا أو رسالة ماجستير ، دار الكتب والوثائق، بغداد.

السيد، فؤاد. (1979). علم النفس الإحصائي وقياس العقل البشري ط.3 القاهرة: دار الفكر العربي.

عودة، احمد سليمان والملكاوي، خليل يوسف(2000)، الإحصاء لمباحث في التربية والعموم الإنسانية، ط1، دار الفكر لمنشر والتوزيع عمان.

فرج، صفوة(1988)، القياس النفسي، دار الفكر العربي، القاهرة.

Ali, F., Zhang, Q., Tauni, M. Z., & Shahzad, K. (2023). Social Chatbot: my friend in my distress. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(7), 1702–1712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2150745- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2150745

Al-Shafei, M. (2025). Empowerment and psychological outcomes in chatbot interactions. Journal of Digital Health and Psychology.

Ali, R., et al. (2023). Building trust through humor: Social chatbots and human friendship. International Journal of Social Robotics.

Chin, et al. (2023). Self-disclosure to AI vs. Humans: The judgment-free environment of chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior.

Croes, I. C., & Antheunis, M. L. (2021). Can we be friends with chatbots? The development of socially dynamic relationships with a personal assistant. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106912.

De Freitas, et al. (2024). AI companions: Emotional support and self-reflection in chatbot users. Human-Machine Communication Journal.

Devaram, S. (2020). The efficacy of AI tools in therapeutic assistance and companionship. Technical Report.

Diener, E., et al. (2003). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener. Social Indicators Research Series.

Hancock, J. T., & Miner, A. S. (2018). Psychological benefits of AI-mediated communication. Stanford University Research Archive.

Jain, G., et al. (2024). Therapeutic potential of conversational AI in mental health frameworks. Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Jain, G., et al. (2026). Social AI as digital companions: Enhancing emotional bonding and mitigating isolation. Future of Information Technology Journal.

Jefferies, P., & Ungar, M. (2020). Social anxiety and its impact on functional performance and well-being. Clinical Psychology Review.

Loveys, K., et al. (2022). Conversational agents and the enhancement of intimacy and life satisfaction. Psychology of Popular Media.

Marriott, H. R., & Pitardi, V. (2023). Natural language processing and emotional bonds in AI companionship. Journal of Business Research.

Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153

Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1979). Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy. John Wiley & Sons

Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11

Skjuve, M., et al. (2022). My chatbot companion: A study of long-term relationships between users and social chatbots. New Media & Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601

Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other.

WHO (World Health Organization). (2024). Loneliness as a global public health crisis: A comprehensive report. WHO Publications.

Xie, B., & Wang, Y. (2024). Judgment-free environments: The role of AI in social anxiety management. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.

Zhou, L., et al. (2020). The design and implementation of XiaoIce, an empathetic social chatbot. Computational Linguistics.

Jain, G., Patole, E., & Pareek, S. (2026). Digital companionship: The interplay of conversational AI, loneliness, social anxiety, and quality of life among young adults. Acta Psychologica, 264, 106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106467

Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1979). Blueprint for a social psychological theory of loneliness. Love and attraction, 101-110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-022234-9.50020-0

Zhou, L., Gao, J., Li, D., & Shum, H. Y. (2020). The design and implementation of xiaoice, an empathetic social chatbot. Computational Linguistics, 46(1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00368

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15

Issue

Section

Educational and psychological sciences

How to Cite

Hatem , D. (2026). Interaction with Social Artificial Intelligence and its Relationship to Psychological Loneliness among Young People. Al-Adab Journal, 68(3), 391-418. https://doi.org/10.31973/wkt86q66

Publication Dates

Received

2026-04-26

Revised

2026-05-17

Accepted

2026-05-19

Published Online First

2026-09-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1733

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.