A Pragmatic Study of Selected short stories

Authors

  • Asst.Lect. Aya Flayih Hasan Abd-Al Nabi Al-Mustansiriyah University, College of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/bmyg1d55

Keywords:

Implicature, conventional implicature, conversational implicature, cooperative principle, maxim

Abstract

In pragmatic studies, there must be pragmatic tools and strategies used to analyze utterances. This study is based on using conversational implicatures to conduct a pragmatic analysis.   Conversational implicature is one of the most important and interesting pragmatic tool that may be produced in conversations. In literary works like short stories, characters speak to each other, communicate, argue, make fun, criticize and even lie to each other. They may convey different information and meanings by their utterances, and conversational implicature is one way to achieve that by saying something and meaning something else. This study aims at identifying and analyzing conversational implicatures produced by the characters of the three selected short stories. This study tries to answer the question: how is conversational implicature as a pragmatic strategy used by the characters of the three selected fictional works?. Grice’s cooperative principle is used in this study to explain and analyze conversational implicatures. The characters in these short stories produce utterances just like people in real life. Their utterances could be direct without any implied meanings, and they also could be indirect. The characters may violate one or more of the maxims suggested by Grice in their conversations, accordingly, conversational implicatures are produced. This study identifies the violations of the maxims and analyzes them in terms of what implied meanings are there behind that violation.

0 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226

Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken Discourse. New York: Longman Inc.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 41-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Hurford, J. R. (1983). Semantics of Coursebook. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kridalaksana, H. (2011). Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Leech, G. (1983). Principle of Pragmatics. USA: Longman Group.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

Levinson, S. (1991). Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.

Mey, J. L. (1998). Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. New York: Elseiver.

Nababan, P. (1987). Ilmu Pragmatik: Teori dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. New York: Cmbridge University Press.

Parker, F. (1986). Linguistics for Non Linguist. London: Taylor and Francis.

Stalnaker. (1989). On Grandy on Grice. The Journal of Philosophy, 526- 527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil1989861022

Wijana, I. D. (1996). Dasar- dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wright, R. A. (1975). Meaning non- natural and Conversational Implicature. Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

https://www.richardevanoff.com/fiction/short-stories

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Abd-Al Nabi, A. (2026). A Pragmatic Study of Selected short stories. Al-Adab Journal, 68(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.31973/bmyg1d55

Publication Dates

Received

2025-05-27

Revised

2025-06-11

Accepted

2025-06-12

Published Online First

2026-09-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.