Politainment as a Speech Event

A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Participation in Political Satire Shows

Authors

  • Shawqi K. Ismail University of Baghdad, College of Arts
  • Prof. Sundus Muhsin Ali Al Ubaidy University of Baghdad, College of Arts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/2ev16q24

Keywords:

politainment, speech event, socio-pragmatics, entertaining politics, political satire

Abstract

This study is an attempt to approach the notion of politainment from the socio-pragmatic framework of participation. Politainment is a relatively new concept that describes a merge between the political and entertainment genres as a result of the effect of modern media platforms on politics. It falls into two main categories: political entertainment, and entertaining politics. Political entertainment usually involves the utilisation of political agendas in entertainment like movies and music; while entertaining politics involves the politicians attending entertainment events to advocate for their political agendas. The focus of the current study is on entertaining politics as a speech event. The event in question is a political satire show. This study tries to analyse such event in terms of the socio-pragmatic notion of participation which tries to account for the different production and reception roles played by the politician and the other people in these shows in order to establish the speech event itself. The sample of the study consists of an interview with a politician in an entertainment show. The main finding of this study is that this type of events tends to be more on the entertainment side than adopting a political theme.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (1996). Identifying mutual understanding. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 1-34). Cambridge University Press.

Chovanec, J., & Dynel, M. (2015). Participation in public and social media interactions. In J. Chovanec & M. Dynel (Eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions (pp. 1-28). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news-interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 163-198). Cambridge University Press.

Dorner, J. (2001). Entertainment politics: The transformation of political communication. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Drake, P., & Miah, A. (2010). The cultural politics of celebrity. Cultural Politics, 6(1), 49-64.

https://doi.org/10.2752/175174210X12591372143094

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Pantheon Books.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53-73.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Haugh, M. (2013). Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), 41-56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.001

Holt, E., & O'Driscoll, J. (2021). Participation framework and participation footing in discourse analysis. In K. Aijmer & D. Biber (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 130-150). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161-227). Polity Press.

Levinson, S. C. ([1979] 1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 66-100). Cambridge University Press.

Nieland, J. (2015). Politainment: Political engagement in a mediated world. Journal of Political Communication, 32(4), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1016442

Radošinská, J., Becker, V., Horký, D., & Marsikova, K. (2021). Politainment as a hybrid genre: Blurring the boundaries between politics and entertainment. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720973565

Riegert, K., & Collins, D. (2015). Politainment and social media: The case of Facebook. In K. Riegert & D. Collins (Eds.), Politainment: The transformation of politics in the digital age (pp. 105-120). Routledge.

Scollon, R. (1996). Discourse identity and social interaction. Ablex Publishing.

Street, J. (2012). Do celebrity politics and celebrity politicians matter? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14(3), 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00476.x

Wadensjö, C. (1998). Interpreting as interaction. Longman.

Spicer, S. (2021, October, 30). Sean Spicer. "Radical Nation" [Interview by Bill Maher]. Real Time with Bill Maher. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcpzcyX1ILE&list=PLajuJYZKBz2T9tvgC0WfupaE4VcMiqx_n&index=25. Retrived May 17, 2023

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Ismail, S., & Al Ubaidy, S. . (2025). Politainment as a Speech Event: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Participation in Political Satire Shows. Al-Adab Journal, 154, 41-64. https://doi.org/10.31973/2ev16q24

Publication Dates

Received

2024-08-11

Revised

2024-09-01

Accepted

2024-09-16

Published Online First

2025-09-15

Similar Articles

11-20 of 488

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.