Sisters' Muffled Voice
A Feminist Reading of Edith Wharton’s Bunner Sisters and Taha Husain's The Call of The Curlew
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/rmtz9d17Keywords:
Wharton, Husain, patriarchy, segregation, sisters, curlew, hegemonyAbstract
The present paper offers a comparative feminist reading of the American novelist Edith Wharton and the Egyptian novelist Taha Husain. It aims at analyzing both Wharton’s Bunner Sisters (1916) and Husain’s The Call of The Curlew (1934/1980) in terms of feminist criticism demonstrated in Beauvoir’s theory of patriarchy in her book: The Second Sex (2010). The analysis of these novellas provokes three substantial points regarding the artistic achievement of both writers. First, patriarchy is a male programming intended to subdue and decentralize the female by treating them as a sexed being, or rather as an inessential other. Second, the inferior position of women inspires Wharton and Husain to incorporate Beauvoir’s theory of patriarchy into their fictional works. To attain such an aim, both writers start narrative visions through which they expose patriarchal methods to marginalize and subordinate women. Lastly, the close reading of the novellas shows that they reflect the systemized oppression of women. Such is the shared leitmotif of Wharton and Husain’s narrative.
Downloads
References
Awwad, A. M. (2001). Gossip, Scandal, Shame and Honor Killing: A Case for Social Constructionism and hegemonic Discourse. Social Thought & Research, 24(1/2), 39–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23250074
Beauvoir, S.D.(2010). The Second Sex (Constance Borde & Sheila Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.)New York: Vintage Books.
Bennett, T. (1995). The Birth of Museum: History, Theory and Politics. London: Routledg.
BOYLE, E. A. (2015). “Becoming a Part of Her Innermost Being”: Gender, Mass-Production, and the Evolution of Department Store Culture in Edith Wharton’s “Bunner Sisters.” American Literary Realism, 47(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerlitereal.47.3.0203.
French, M. (1987). Muzzled Women. College Literature, 14(3), 219–229. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111750.
Husain, T.(1980). The Call of the Curlew. (A.B.As-Safi Trans.)In M. M. Badawi, University of Oxford(Ed) by E.J. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands (first published as Du’a al-Karawan, Cairo,1934).
Kornasky, L. (1997). On “Listen[ing] to Spectres too”: Wharton’s “Bunner Sisters” and Ideologies of Sexual Selection. American Literary Realism, 1870-1910, 30(1), 47–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27746714.
Li, J. (2017). “Timely” Publication: The Racialized Context of Edith Wharton’s “Bunner Sisters.” Edith Wharton Review, 33(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.5325/editwharrevi.33.1.0079.
McDowell, M. B. (1974). Viewing the Custom of Her Country: Edith Wharton’s Feminism. Contemporary Literature, 15(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/1207776.
Nolin, K. (1973). “The Call of the Curlew”, by Taha Husayn, an Essay in Appreciation. MELA Notes, 1, 14–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29784935.
Qassis-Jaraysah, M. (2011). Killing Women under the Name of so-called “Family Honor.” In S. Adwan & A. G. Wildfeuer (Eds.), Participation and Reconciliation: Preconditions of Justice (1st ed., Vol. 16, pp. 159–172). Verlag Barbara Budrich. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkk0nb.18.
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical Theory Today: A User - Friendly Guide (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asst. Prof. Ban Salah Shaalan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
