Ideological Representation of Women's Oppression in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale

A Critical Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Huda Aziz Muhi Al-shammari M.A. Student, Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Karbala
  • Nidaa Hussain Fahmi Al-Khazraji, PHD Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Karbala .

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v3i138.1771

Keywords:

Ideology, Critical Discourse Analysis, oppression, Van Dijk's ideological Square, The Handmaid's Tale

Abstract

The abuse of women is an issue that persists throughout the ages till the present time because people are still living in a world of a dominated idea which is known as man is the self and woman is the other. So the objective of this research paper is to argue this global issue using Van Dijk's Ideological Square (1998) as a framework so as to examine the ideologies that underline the use of language in The Handmaid’s Tale. It is hypothesized that the ideology of oppression is exposed in the novel throughout using the ideological strategies of positive- self presentation and negative-other presentation. Ultimately, it concludes that the novelist employs both, male and female, characters to consistently ridicule and offer negative coverage about women and to increasingly align and offer favorable comments about men to present the world of patriarchy from a different perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atwood, M. (1996). The Handmaid's Tale, London: Vintage.

Briggs, J. (2006). Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available at: http://www.joannabriggs.eduau/ cqrmg/role.html.

Cook, G. (1990) Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hardiman, R., Jackson, B. W., & Griffin, P. (2010). Conceptual foundations. In B. Adams, Castaneda, Hackman, Peters & Zْniga (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (pp. 26-35). New York, NY: Routledge.

Schiffrin, D. (2006). Discourse. In R. Fasold &J. Connor-Linton (Eds.) An introduction to Language and Linguistics (pp. 169-203). Cambridge: CUP.

Van Dijk T.A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Van Dijk T.A. (2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis. In Christopher J. Hart (Ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition (pp. 27-63). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Van Dijk, T.A (1983) Discourse Analysis: Its Development and Application to the Structure of News, Journal of Communication. Vol. 33(2) pp. 20-43

Van Dijk, T.A (2000). Parliamentary Debates. Dins Wodak, R; van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (2000) Racism at the top. Parliamentary Discourse on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klangenfurt, Austria, Drava Verlag.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-15

Issue

Section

English linguistics and literature

How to Cite

Ideological Representation of Women’s Oppression in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: A Critical Discourse Analysis. (2021). Al-Adab Journal, 3(138), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v3i138.1771

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

1-10 of 484

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.