La posición crítica literaria de Francisco Ayala en Lazarillo de Tormes

Authors

  • Intidhar Ali Gaber Universidad de Bagdad/Facutad de Lenguas/Departamento español

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i128.411

Keywords:

Ayala, literary criticism, Lazarillo de Tormes

Abstract

The article presents a model of literary criticism of Ayala in Picaresco's novel which is a kind of literary narrative that tells the lives of miserable vagrant and the name of the novel is (Lazarillo de Tormes. The reason for choosing the work of the study is to show a new and different aspect of Ayala's critical creativity and to mention the basic rules of the author in his critique of literary works which  have a relation with the structural and formal frame of work . In this study we try to shed light on the most important points that highlighted in the criticism of Lazarillo de Tormes. The writer and literary critic Francisco Ayala is known for his comprehensive critique attitude which applied on his work and other authors, and according to researchers who showed interest in the study of his literary works, such as Professor Antonio Chicharro and Andres Amoros, that the author was following a very important criterion in his work as a critic which is the importance of apprehension and understanding the literary world and inhere he refers to the understanding of the reality or the history of literary work which makes it more understandable to readers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Intidhar Ali Gaber, Universidad de Bagdad/Facutad de Lenguas/Departamento español

References

AYALA, Francisco. «El Guzman de Afarach. Consolidación del género picaresco». Las plumas del fénix: estudios de literatura española. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1989.

___________ “Función social de la literatura”, Revista de Occidente, num. 10, 1964. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/363908.

___________.“Formación del género picareca: El Lazarillo de Tormes”, La Nación, 1960.

____________.«El Lazarillo: Nuevo examen de algunos aspectos», Cuadernos Americanos, num. XXVI, 1967.

__________«Hacia una semblanza de Quevedo». Las plumas de Fénix. Estudio de Literatura española. Madrid: Alianza. 1989.

_____________. Las plumas del fénix: estudios de literatura española. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, D.L., 1989.

___________. «Lazarillo» reexaminado, Madrid: Cuadernos Taurus, 1971.

ALBERT, A. Sicroff. «Sobre el estilo del Lazarillo de Tormes», NRFH, num. XI. 1957.

AMORÓS, Andrés “Conversación con Francisco Ayala, en Francisco Ayala”. Barcelona: Anthropos Ministerio de Cultura, 1989.

ANÓNIMO . El lazarillo de Tormes. Barcelona: Plutón edición X,S.L., 2011.

CARDONA, Francisco Lluís.“Estudio preliminar”, en El Lazarillo de Tormes. Barcelona: Plutón edición X,S.L., 2011.

CHICHARRO, Antonio. El pensamiento vivo de Francisco Ayala. Granada: Ediciones de Dauro, 2006.

RICO, Francisco. Lazarillo de Tormes, Letras hispánicas, Madrid: Cátedra, num. 44., 1990.

Published

2019-03-15

Issue

Section

Foreign linguistics and literature

How to Cite

La posición crítica literaria de Francisco Ayala en Lazarillo de Tormes. (2019). Al-Adab Journal, 128, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i128.411

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

1-10 of 871

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.