Dialectal differences in the Production of English Vowels by Iraqi EFL Learners at University Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i143.3917Keywords:
gilit, qeltuAbstract
The present study investigates whether or not Iraqi EFL learners’ native dialect has an impact on their pronunciation of English monophthongs and to examine the reasons, behind the mispronunciation, they are expected to commit. To achieve this goal, sixty Iraqi participants speaking two Iraqi dialects i.e. qeltu and gilit dialect, were engaged to achieve a speech production task of the eleven English monophthongs in a /hvd/ context. The data were analyzed using PRAAT to extract first and second formant frequencies and as well as vowel duration for each vowel. Lobanov’s TELESUR G normalization algorithm (2006) was tracked to normalize F1 and F2 values. The normalized data were compared to results from Deterding (1997) and walls (1962). The results showed that Iraqi EFLLs produced the targeted vowels shorter than the control group represented by native English. In terms vowel quality, they produced lower and more fronted vowels than the control group. In addition, this study revealed that there are statistically significant cross-dialectal differences between gilit and qeltu-speaking EFLLs in the production English vowels. It is concluded that learners’ mother tongue has a role in their production of English vowels.
Downloads
References
Hubais, A., & Pillai, S. (2010). An instrumental analysis of English vowels produced by Omanis. Journal of Modern Languages, 20(1), 1-18.
Ahmed, A. (2008). Production and perception of Libyan Arabic vowels, (published PhD. Dissertation). UK: Newcastle University.
Al Abdely, A. A. (2021). The Pronunciation of English Low Vowels by Iraqi EFL Learners: An Intralingual Analysis. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(3), 154-166. Retrieved from `http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2103-09.
Al Abdely, A. A. W., & Thai, Y. N. (2016a). Learning English Vowels by Iraqi EFL Learners: Perceived Difficulty versus Actual Performance. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(1), 1-14.
Al-Abdely, A. A. W., & Yap, N. T. (2016). Learning English vowels by Iraqi EFL learners: perceived difficulty versus actual performance. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(1),1 – 18.
Al-Ani, S. (1970). Arabic phonology. The Hague: Mouton.
Ali, E. M. T. (2013). Pronunciation problems: Acoustic analysis of the English vowels produced by Sudanese learners of English. International Journal of English and Literature, 4(10),495-507.
Al-Tamimi, J. (2007). Static and Dynamic cues in vowel production: A cross-dialectal study in Jordanian and Moroccan Arabic. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS),541–544. Germany: Saarbrücken.
Aluqeily, sh .Y.(2012).A Phonological analysis of segmental phonemes in standard English and a phonological analysis of segmental phonemes in standard English and Hit Iraqi Arabic.(unpublished M.A Thesis). College of education for humanities, university of Anbar
Blanc, H. (1964). Communal dialects in Baghdad. Cambridgeː Harvard University Press.
Brown, A., & Oyer, S. (2013). Vowel project: Analysis of a Native-Arabic speaker. Linguistic Portfolios, 2(1), 4.
Deterding, D. (2006). The North Wind versus a Wolf: short texts for the description and measurement of English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36(2)187–196
Haji, S. S., & Mohammed, F. O. (2019). An Analysis of the Pronouncing of English Monophthongs by Kurdish EFL University Students (Northern Kurmanji Speakers). Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 7(4), 515-524.
Hellmuth, S. (2013). The (absence of) prosodic reflexes of given/new information status in Egyptian Arabic. In Information structure in spoken Arabic p.183-206. Oxford: Routledge
Jasim, M. I. (2020). Tafxi: m in the vowels of Muslawi qeltu and Baghdadi gilit dialects of Mesopotamian Arabic ((published Ph.D. Thesis) .UK: Newcastle University.
Khalid, S. (2014). Comparative study of the acoustic vowel space of Egyptian English vowels and general American English vowels. Linguistic Portfolios, 3(1), 8.
Ladafoged.p.(2006). A course in phonetics. Boston: Thomas Walworth.
Ladefoged, P. (2001). Vowels and consonants. Phonetica, 58(3), 211-212.
Lucic, I. (2015). Acoustic analysis of Montenegrin English L2 vowels: production and perception. Linguistic Portfolios, 4(1), 7. retrieved from https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol4/iss1/7
Mitleb, F. (1981). Timing of English vowels spoken with an Arabic accent. Research in Phonetics, 2, 193-226.
Mohammed, F. (2018). Social Network Integration and Language Change in Progress in Iraqi Arabic: A Sociophonetic Study of Dialect Levelling in the Hīti Dialect (published Ph.D. thesis). University of Leeds. Retrieved from: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/21338/2/Thesis_Fuad%20Mohammed.pdf
Munro, M. J. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36(1), 39-66.
Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Stevens, K. and A. House. (1963). Perturbation of Vowel Articulations by Consonantal Context: an Acoustical Study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 6, 111-128.
Versteegh, K. (2014). Arabic language.UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Wells, J. C. (1962). A Study of the e Formants of the Pure Vowels of British English, (published MA Thesis). London: University College
Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of phonetics, 24(2), 245-261
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
