Speech Acts and Politeness in Nixon and Bush's Victory Speech
A Pragmatic study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i138.1738Keywords:
Speech acts, Politeness, Victory speech, Political DiscourseAbstract
This study is primarily concerned with examining the speech acts and politeness strategies manifested in American presidential victory speech. The study aims at showing the applicability of both Searle's classification of speech acts and Leech's politeness maxims appeared in this genre by finding out the frequency and percentage of the two types. Then, analyzing the variation of these types among the selected samples. The research follows a mixed method of analysis as both qualitative and quantitative methods are used. It has been concluded that four forms of Searle's illocutionary acts have appeared in American presidential victory speech. These acts are assertives, expressives, directives and commissives, while declaration speech acts have never been used by the selected candidates. Regarding politeness theory, it has been found that approbation and agreement have the most frequent occurrence in this genre compared to the other maxims.
Downloads
References
Austin, J.L. (1962) How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.
Austin, J.L. (1975) How To Do Things With Words, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics & phonetics (5th ed). Blackwell Pub.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Pub.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/nov/04/uselections2004.usa17
https://www.nytimes.com/1972/11/08/archives/transcript-of-nixons-victory-speech.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/us/politics/04text-obama.html
Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lakoff R T (1973) The logic of politeness; or, minding your p ' s and c's. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
Lakoff R T (1977) Politeness, pragmatics and performatives. In Rogers A, Wall B, Murphy J (eds) Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presupposition and Implicature. Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D. C, pp79-106
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Mey (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed). Blackwell Publishers.
Reiter, R. M. (2000). Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A contrastive study of requests and apologies. John Benjamins Publishing
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J., Kiefer, F. and Bierwisch, M. (Eds.) (1980). Speech act theory and pragmatics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman
Van Dijk (2002). Political discourse and Political Cognition (P. A. Chilton & C. Schaffner, Eds.; pp. 203–237).
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford Univ. Press.
Zheng, T. (2000). Characteristics of Australian Political Language Rhetoric: Tactics of Gaining Public Support and Shrinking Responsibility. School of Asian Language and Studies": University of Tasmania
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
