Sociology of Health and Illness
A comparison field Study between Rural and Urban: Wasit Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i137.1642Keywords:
health, disease, rural, urban, Wasit GovernorateAbstract
The most important of the study: It was found that respondents and of the total sample units answered yes, which is the highest percentage, which is considered the family is the social environment that works to instill health education among its members in the countryside. In urban areas, respondents were interviewed and of the total sample units were yes. The family is considered the social environment that instills health education among its members, as evidenced by the fact that both rural and urban areas considered the family to be the social environment in which Is working to instill health education among its members, but the rural population recorded the highest proportion of urban.
were interviewed and of the total sample units were found to be different behavior of the family in dealing with its members when the disease in the countryside. In urban areas, respondents responded with of the total sample units. Yes, they also find a difference in the behavior of the family in dealing with its members at the time of illness. As a result, the rural and urban areas registered the highest percentage of yes. However, rural areas are higher than urban areas.
respondents of the total sample units do not agree with the occurrence of diseases in the family due to the death of a relative in the countryside, followed by the urban side with respondents and of the total The sample units do not agree with the diseases that occur in the family due to the death of a relative. As a result, the highest percentage of respondents in rural areas is higher than urban, ie they do not agree with the occurrence of diseases in the family due to the death of a relative.
and of the total sample units do not agree that the individual exposure to social isolation leads to illness in the countryside, followed by the urban side with respondents and of the total sample units Do not agree with the individual exposure to social isolation lead to the disease, and we conclude that the countryside recorded the highest proportion of urban exposure to isolation as a result of the disease.
of the total sample units. All of the family members took care of the patient in the countryside, followed by the urban side, with respondents and of the total sample units taking the whole family attention We all conclude that the rural and urban scored the highest percentage of the answer, yes, that the family members all of them take care of the patient now that the rural compared to the urban were the highest in the answer.
and of the total sample units do not consider the incidence of the disease to lead to the instability of family life socially in the countryside, followed by the urban side with respondents and of Total sample units do not consider the disease to lead to the instability of family life socially. It results from the fact that urban recorded the highest percentage of rheumatoid.
Downloads
References
Abraham Maslow، Mental Health: A Philosophical Analysis،Vol1، Kluwer Academic Publishers، Netherlands، 2001.
Fran Collyer، The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health، Illness and Medicine، Vo l1، published on that website www.books.google.com، Australia.
Professor Sama Hewa، Theories of disease causation: Social epidemiology and epidemiological transition، Resaeach published in Galle Medical Journal،Vol 20، 2015.
Weber ، max. Basic Concepts of Sociology Green wood press، New York، 1983.
Zerihun Doda، M.A، Introduction to Sociology، First Edition، Ethiopia، 2005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.