The societal views for addiction recoverees’ in the UAE Society ’

A perspective study of community members’ opinions on addiction recoverees

Authors

  • Wafa Barhoumi University Of Sharjah \ Sharjah\UAE
  • Fatima Ahmad Algharbawi University Of Sharjah \ Sharjah\UAE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i139.1440

Keywords:

Social perspectives, recovering addict, addiction

Abstract

The aim of this research was to find out how the UAE society views people who have recovered from addiction. The data was gathered using a scale with positive and negative statements based on four fundamental axes: First and foremost, how do community members react to a recovering addict in general?  Second, the extent to which recovering addicts are accepted in various social communities. Third, the presence of stigma or rejection by community members when dealing with a recovering addict. And fourth, the effect of the interaction of gender and age level on the attitudes of the sample members toward recovering addicts.

In addition, an in-depth interview with ten respondents from addicts who recovered and returned to Al-Amal Private Hospital for treatment or follow-up was conducted. The interviews focused on showing and demonstrating the experiences of those recovering from addiction in dealing with the external community and the extent to which it accepts them, their integration into various "social, environment, professional" aspects and their exposure to stigma and ostracism within their societies.

According to recovering addicts' narratives, the attitude of Emirati community members on recovering addicts is relatively positive, with negative indicators about "safety, trust, dealing, and integration" acting as a barrier to their integration into social capital. This result, which contradicted the respondents' accounts and the existence of a declining social perception, regardless of age and gender, was found to be related to demographic factors (gender/age) and attitudes of Emirati community members toward recovering addicts. Furthermore, there is a significant gap between what the recovered believes from societal reality after his recovery and individual society's perceptions and attitudes, which is a totally contradictory gap that reflects a lack of community members' awareness in dealing properly with this recovering addict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A fresh approach to drugs, The final report of the UK Drug Policy Commission. October 2012, UKDPC.

Bathish, R., Best, D., Savic, M., Beckwith, M., Mackenzie, J., & Lubman, D. I. (2017). “Is it me or should my friends take the credit?” The role of social networks and social identity in recovery from addiction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(1), 35-46.

Best, D. W., & Lubman, D. I. (2012). The recovery paradigm: A model of hope and change for alcohol and drug addiction. Australian family physician, 41(8), 593-597.

Best, D., Bird, K., & Hunton, L. (2015). 14 Recovery as a social phenomenon. Positive criminology, 194.

Boundy, D. & Colello, T. (1998), Preventing relapse among minner – city recovering addicts. Research repot (Phase I) . National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Buckingham, S., Frings, D. & Albery, I. (2013) Group membership and social identity in addiction recovery, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(4), 1132-1140 doi: 10.1037/a0032480

Chandler,R.K.fletcher B.W.Volkow,N.D.(2009).Treating drug abuse and addiction the criminal justice system: Improving public health and safety.the journal of the Amercion Medial Association,301(2).183-190.

Cloud, W. & Granfield, G. (2008) Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 1971-1986

Crabtree, J. W., Haslam, S. A., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2010). Mental health support groups, stigma and self-esteem: Positive and negative implications of group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 553-569.

Cruwys, T., Dingle, G., Hornsey, M., Jetten, J., Oei, T. & Walter, T. (2014). Social isolation schema responds to positive social experiences: Longitudinal evidence from vulnerable populations, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 265-280.

Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Depression and social identity: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 215-238. doi: 10.1177/1088868314523839

Daley, D. C. & Marlatt, G. A. (1992) “Relapse Prevention”, Research Monograph. Pittsburgh : Western Psychiatric Institute.

Daley, D. C. (1992). “Relapse : A guide for successful recovery. Bradenton , FL : Human Service Institute.

Gideon, L. (2007). Family role in the reintegration process of recovering drug addicts: A qualitative review of Israeli offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(2), 212-226.

Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (2001). Social context and “natural recovery”: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Substance use & misuse, 36(11), 1543-1570.

Hreish, K., Okkeh, M., Fareed, A. J., & Byers, D. S. (2019). Attitudes among young adults in Palestine about peers with substance use problems: Challenges and opportunities for community intervention design. International Social Work, 62(2), 726-740.

Kubrn,C.E&Stewart.E.A(2006).predicting who reoffends: the rejected role of neighborhood context on recidivism studies criminology,44:165-197.

Laudet, A. B., Magura, S., Vogel, H. S., & Knight, E. (2000). Recovery challenges among dually diagnosed individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18(4), 321-329.

LEmert, E, (1975). primary and Secondary, deviation, New York, deviation, New York, Mcgrouw, Hill.

Lutman, B., Lynch, C., & Monk-Turner, E. (2015). De-demonizing the ‘Monstrous’ drug addict: A qualitative look at social reintegration through rehabilitation and employment. Critical Criminology, 23(1), 57-72.

Nurco, D. N. ; Stephenson, P.E. and Hanlon, T. E. (1990). “Aftercare, Relapse prevention and the self – help movement”. International Journal Of Addiction, 25 (Aug), 1179 – 1200.

Parker, Richard(2003).Medicine,Hiv and Aids-related stigma and discrimination a conceptual framework and implications for action. Vol. 57 Issue 1, p13, 12p

Radcliffe, P., & Stevens, A. (2008). Are drug treatment services only for ‘thieving junkie scumbags’? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities. Social science & medicine, 67(7), 1065-1073.

Recovering Drug Addicts”. Humanity and Society, Volume 20, pp 25 –pp 43.

Sampson,R.J.& Laub.J.H.(2005).A Life course view of the development of crime annals , 602: 12-54

Tammy L. Anderson, Frank Ripullo (1996). “Social Setting, Stigma Management, and

Trovis,J.(2002).Invisible punishment : the collateral consequences of mass imprisonment(Eds) .

Weinberg, D. (2000). “Out there”: The ecology of addiction in drug abuse treatment discourse. Social Problems, 47(4), 606-621.

White, W. L. (2009). The mobilization of community resources to support long-term addiction recovery. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 36(2), 146-158.

William Lee White (2007). “Addiction recovery: Its definition and conceptual boundaries”. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33(3):229-41, DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.015.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

Issue

Section

Sociology

How to Cite

The societal views for addiction recoverees’ in the UAE Society ’: A perspective study of community members’ opinions on addiction recoverees. (2021). Al-Adab Journal, 1(139), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i139.1440

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

1-10 of 520

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)