The Destruction of Gilead’s Binary Thought In Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i119.337Abstract
This paper focuses on interpreting Margret Atwood’s outlook towards the affiliation of power between man and woman, and, likewise, the hidden meaning of her message(s) to women in general. These issues will be explained by interpreting or considering her novel, The Handmaid’s Tale as a pattern of oppositions. The conceptual tool that is used to uncover the keys for the questions of whether Atwood is with or against women and how she visualizes women’s experience and distress under the patriarchal rules are; binary oppositions and Derrida’s concept of différance. Using the binary oppositions Gilead’s central and restricted ideologies and the handmaids’ silent response become comprehensible. Then by reversing these binary conceptions, depending on Derrida’s concept, the incompatibles will be proved. Atwood’s depiction of woman is not always positive and not negative as well. Therefore, this paper assumes that women are being used and dehumanized in Gilead which gives hints for the author’s view of men’s inclination to imprison women and deprive them from their right to live a normal life. Furthermore, the binary thought depicts women as inert and powerless. The second part and after reversing the binary opposition we conclude that the handmaids and women in general are able to convert the hierarchical belief by taking on the same tool that has been used to oppress them.
Downloads
References
Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. New Jersy: Pearson Education , 2007 .
Clement, Helene Cixous and Catherine. The Newly Born Woman. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press, 1986.
Daugher, Michelle Miller-Day and Carla Fisher. "Communication over the life span: The mother-adult Daugher Relationship ." Kory Floyd, and Mark Morman. Widening the Family Circle: New Research on Family Communication. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2006. 1-16.
Hammer, Stephanie Barbé. "The World As It Will Be? Female Satire and the Technology of Power in The Handmaid's Tale." Modern Language Studies (1990): 39-49.
Harpham, M.H. Abrams and Geoffery Galt. A Glossary of Literary Terms. wadsworth: Michael Rosenberg, 2012.
Irele, Abiola F. "The Crisis of Cultural Memory in Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart." African Studies Quarterly (2000): 1-41 .
Johnson, B. The critical difference: Essays in the contemporary rhetoric of reading. London: John Hopkins University Press., 1980.
Loigo, Lembi. the Expression and Realisation of Power Relationships Through Language in Margaret Atwood's Dystopian Novel The Handmaid's Tale. Master Thesis. Tartu: University of Tartu, 2007.
Mary Ellen Snodgrass. CliffsNotes on Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Hungry Minds, 1994.
Miner, Madonne. "Trust Me: Reading the Romance Plot in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale." Twentieth Century Literature (1991): 148-168.
Tolan, Fiona. Margaret Atwood Feminism and Fiction. New York: Editions Rodopi B.V, 2007.
Twohig, Gabriele. "The Politics of Language: a Device of Creativity and Power in Margaret Atwood's Novel The Handmaid's Tale." Liguistik- Server Essen (n.d.): 1-34.
Tyson, Lois. Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. New York : Routledge , 2006.
Wood, Diane S. "Bradbury and Atwood. Exile as Rational Decision." Aycock, James Whitlark and Wendall. The Literature of Emigration and Exile. Texas: Texas Tech University Press, 1992. 131-42.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
