مزايا وعيوب نموذج هوي لانماط المطابقة

المؤلفون

  • Lubna Riyadh Abdul Jabbar
  • Sarab Khalil Hameed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i115.1323

الكلمات المفتاحية:

/

الملخص

في نطاق  الوصف اللغوي للنص، اعتمد هوي النهج الذي يرى النص على انه تركيب منظم، والذي يمكن وصفه من خلال انماطة التنظيمية . وفقا لذلك،يمكن الحصول على  البيانات التنظيمية في  نص ما من خلال احصاء الأحتمالات الناتجة من تمازج هذة الأنماط.و في مثل هذا النهج، يمكن ايجاد اي   تركيبة لغوية ، ولكن بعضها غير محتمل بالتأكيد وبالاتفاق.يدعي هوي  انه لايمكن تحقيق الكمال في  وصف هيكلية النص  في أي مجال من مجالات دراسة اللغة، وان   تشكيل مبادئ الهيكلية في اللغة  يفرض على ا للغوي النظر في الاستثناءات، وبالتالي اكتشاف انماط جديدة و متكررة من   خلال الانتظام في عملية تمازج الأنماط .        

 تسلط هذه الدراسة الضوء على محاسن  وعيوب مثل هذا النهج وإمكانية تطبيقه في تحليل النصوص                                                                                                

التنزيلات

المراجع

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman

Hasan, R. (1984) “Coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Flood, J. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. New York: International Reading Association

Hoey, M. P. (1979) Signalling in Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

--------------- (1982) “Viewing discourse as an aid to English teaching”. Aspect 5, 2, 17-35.

---------------- (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.

-------------- (1984) “The place of clause relational analysis in linguistic description”. English Language Research Journal 4, 1-32.

-------------- (1986) “Overlapping patterns of discourse organization and their implications for clause relational analysis of problem-solution texts”, in Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (eds.) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. London: Sage Publications.

------------- (1988a) “The clustering of lexical cohesion in non-narrative text”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 154-180.

------------ (1988b) “Writing to meet the reader’s needs: text patterning and reading strategies”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 51-73.

------------- (1991a.) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-------------- (1991b.) “Another perspective on coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Mouton: The Hague.

------------- (1993) “A common signal in discourse: how the word reason is used in texts”, in Sinclair, J. M., Hoey, M. and Fox, G. (eds.) Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

------------- (1994) “Signalling in discourse: a functional analysis of a common discourse pattern in written and spoken English”, in Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.

------------- (1996) “Cohesive words: a paper of consequences” in KVHAA Konferencer 36: 71-90. Stockholm.

Hoey, M. P. and E. O. Winter (1986) “Clause relations and the writer’s communicative task”, in Barbara, C. (ed.) Functional Approaches to Writing. London: S.R.P.Ltd.



Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman

Hasan, R. (1984) “Coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Flood, J. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. New York: International Reading Association

Hoey, M. P. (1979) Signalling in Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

--------------- (1982) “Viewing discourse as an aid to English teaching”. Aspect 5, 2, 17-35.

---------------- (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.

-------------- (1984) “The place of clause relational analysis in linguistic description”. English Language Research Journal 4, 1-32.

-------------- (1986) “Overlapping patterns of discourse organization and their implications for clause relational analysis of problem-solution texts”, in Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (eds.) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. London: Sage Publications.

------------- (1988a) “The clustering of lexical cohesion in non-narrative text”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 154-180.

------------ (1988b) “Writing to meet the reader’s needs: text patterning and reading strategies”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 51-73.

------------- (1991a.) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-------------- (1991b.) “Another perspective on coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Mouton: The Hague.

------------- (1993) “A common signal in discourse: how the word reason is used in texts”, in Sinclair, J. M., Hoey, M. and Fox, G. (eds.) Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

------------- (1994) “Signalling in discourse: a functional analysis of a common discourse pattern in written and spoken English”, in Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.

------------- (1996) “Cohesive words: a paper of consequences” in KVHAA Konferencer 36: 71-90. Stockholm.

Hoey, M. P. and E. O. Winter (1986) “Clause relations and the writer’s communicative task”, in Barbara, C. (ed.) Functional Approaches to Writing. London: S.R.P.Ltd.

التنزيلات

منشور

2016-03-15

إصدار

القسم

علم اللغة والأدب الانجليزي

كيفية الاقتباس

Abdul Jabbar, L. R., & Hameed, S. K. (2016). مزايا وعيوب نموذج هوي لانماط المطابقة. مجلة الآداب, 115, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i115.1323

تواريخ المنشور

الأعمال الأكثر قراءة لنفس المؤلف/المؤلفين