مزايا وعيوب نموذج هوي لانماط المطابقة

المؤلفون

  • Lubna Riyadh Abdul Jabbar
  • Sarab Khalil Hameed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i115.1323

الكلمات المفتاحية:

/

الملخص

في نطاق  الوصف اللغوي للنص، اعتمد هوي النهج الذي يرى النص على انه تركيب منظم، والذي يمكن وصفه من خلال انماطة التنظيمية . وفقا لذلك،يمكن الحصول على  البيانات التنظيمية في  نص ما من خلال احصاء الأحتمالات الناتجة من تمازج هذة الأنماط.و في مثل هذا النهج، يمكن ايجاد اي   تركيبة لغوية ، ولكن بعضها غير محتمل بالتأكيد وبالاتفاق.يدعي هوي  انه لايمكن تحقيق الكمال في  وصف هيكلية النص  في أي مجال من مجالات دراسة اللغة، وان   تشكيل مبادئ الهيكلية في اللغة  يفرض على ا للغوي النظر في الاستثناءات، وبالتالي اكتشاف انماط جديدة و متكررة من   خلال الانتظام في عملية تمازج الأنماط .        

 تسلط هذه الدراسة الضوء على محاسن  وعيوب مثل هذا النهج وإمكانية تطبيقه في تحليل النصوص                                                                                                

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman

Hasan, R. (1984) “Coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Flood, J. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. New York: International Reading Association

Hoey, M. P. (1979) Signalling in Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

--------------- (1982) “Viewing discourse as an aid to English teaching”. Aspect 5, 2, 17-35.

---------------- (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.

-------------- (1984) “The place of clause relational analysis in linguistic description”. English Language Research Journal 4, 1-32.

-------------- (1986) “Overlapping patterns of discourse organization and their implications for clause relational analysis of problem-solution texts”, in Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (eds.) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. London: Sage Publications.

------------- (1988a) “The clustering of lexical cohesion in non-narrative text”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 154-180.

------------ (1988b) “Writing to meet the reader’s needs: text patterning and reading strategies”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 51-73.

------------- (1991a.) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-------------- (1991b.) “Another perspective on coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Mouton: The Hague.

------------- (1993) “A common signal in discourse: how the word reason is used in texts”, in Sinclair, J. M., Hoey, M. and Fox, G. (eds.) Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

------------- (1994) “Signalling in discourse: a functional analysis of a common discourse pattern in written and spoken English”, in Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.

------------- (1996) “Cohesive words: a paper of consequences” in KVHAA Konferencer 36: 71-90. Stockholm.

Hoey, M. P. and E. O. Winter (1986) “Clause relations and the writer’s communicative task”, in Barbara, C. (ed.) Functional Approaches to Writing. London: S.R.P.Ltd.



Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman

Hasan, R. (1984) “Coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Flood, J. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. New York: International Reading Association

Hoey, M. P. (1979) Signalling in Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

--------------- (1982) “Viewing discourse as an aid to English teaching”. Aspect 5, 2, 17-35.

---------------- (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.

-------------- (1984) “The place of clause relational analysis in linguistic description”. English Language Research Journal 4, 1-32.

-------------- (1986) “Overlapping patterns of discourse organization and their implications for clause relational analysis of problem-solution texts”, in Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (eds.) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. London: Sage Publications.

------------- (1988a) “The clustering of lexical cohesion in non-narrative text”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 154-180.

------------ (1988b) “Writing to meet the reader’s needs: text patterning and reading strategies”. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4, 51-73.

------------- (1991a.) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-------------- (1991b.) “Another perspective on coherence and cohesion harmony”, in Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Mouton: The Hague.

------------- (1993) “A common signal in discourse: how the word reason is used in texts”, in Sinclair, J. M., Hoey, M. and Fox, G. (eds.) Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

------------- (1994) “Signalling in discourse: a functional analysis of a common discourse pattern in written and spoken English”, in Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.

------------- (1996) “Cohesive words: a paper of consequences” in KVHAA Konferencer 36: 71-90. Stockholm.

Hoey, M. P. and E. O. Winter (1986) “Clause relations and the writer’s communicative task”, in Barbara, C. (ed.) Functional Approaches to Writing. London: S.R.P.Ltd.

التنزيلات

منشور

2016-03-15

إصدار

القسم

علم اللغة والأدب الانجليزي

كيفية الاقتباس

Abdul Jabbar, L. R., & Hameed, S. K. (2016). مزايا وعيوب نموذج هوي لانماط المطابقة. مجلة الآداب, 115, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i115.1323

تواريخ المنشور

الأعمال الأكثر قراءة لنفس المؤلف/المؤلفين