Syntax-Semantics Interface in Linguistic Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i122.233Abstract
According to a process called selected focusing, the linguist in order to produce a coherent statement or an adequate description has to focus on one aspect of a language and exclude the others. Yet, such isolation is only an artificial element. A layman or a child does not have a least idea about the various levels of language. Yet, he is very-well equipped with the grammatical, structural, and semantic tools that help him to instantly identify the ill-formed or unmeaningful sentences of his native language as language is learned and taught as a whole.
With regard to syntax-semantics interface in linguistic literature, two opposite mainstreams have been found; a syntactically- oriented perspective (Chomsky 1957, 65, 79, 81, Cullicover 1976, Radford 1988, Horrock 1987, and Haegman 1992) modified and supported later on by the Optimality Theory approach (henceforth OT) established by Alan Prince and Paul Smolensky (1993) and a semantically-oriented one in its two facets the generative and the interpretive (Jerrold J. Katz & Jerry A. Fodor: 1963, George Lakoff 1963) developed in some of its aspects by Charles Fillmore's case grammar (1968). Furthermore, a great deal of effort has been proposed in line with these two opposite approaches to produce some experimental psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic studies to support or reject one or both of them (Millar & Mckean 1964, Savin & Perchonock 1965, and Clifton & Odom 1966, Gleason, J. & Ratner, N. 1993, Friederici, Angela D., & Jürgen Weissenborn 2007).
The early generative transformational approach went too far in insisting that the syntactic aspect has an autonomous characteristic and should be dealt with in isolation from semantics; others argue that they are interrelated and cannot be separated. Some linguists as the generative semanticists consider semantics as more basic in grammatical description than syntax; whereas, others hold a totally reversed approach assuming that semantics cannot be described and it should be considered as an extra-linguistic element.
This paper is at attempt to shed some light on this serious linguistic controversy to arrive at some general outlines that might help the linguistic theorists, language second/foreign teachers and students to establish a scientific scheme in dealing with language.
Downloads
References
• Allen, J. & Buren, P. (1975). Chomsky's Selected Readings. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
• Andrews D, Avery (2005). Architectures, Rules and Preferences: A Festschrift for Joan Bresnan. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
• Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Course book on Translation. London and New York: Routledge.
• Beaver, D. & Lee. H. (2003). "Input-Output Mismatches in OT" in Optimality Theory and Pragmatics by Reinhard Blutner and Henk Zeevat (eds.) 5–7. Palgrave: Macmillan.
• Blutner, R. (1998). "Lexical Pragmatics" in Journal of Semantics 15, PP. 115-162. J
• Blutner, R. (1999). "Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation" in Papers on Optimality Theoretic Semantics by Helen de Hoop and Henriette de Swart (eds.). Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.
• Blutner, R. (2000). "Against Lexical Decomposition in Syntax" in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference, IATL 7 (A.Z. Wyner, ed.), University of Haifa PP. 113-137.
• Blutner, R. (2001). "Two Case Studies in Lexical Pragmatics" in E. Nemeth & K. Bibok (eds.) Pragmatics and Flexibility of Word Meaning, PP. 11-28. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
• Blutner, R., H. de Hoop, & Petra Hendriks (2006). Optimal Communication. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
• Bouma, L. (2004). The Role of the Lexicon in Optimality Theoretic Syntax. Proceedings of the LFG04 Conference Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (Editors) CSLI Publications http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/.
• Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. London: Blackwell
• Carpenter, P. A. & M. A. Just (1975). "Sentence Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Processing Model of Verification" in Psychological Review, 82. PP. 45-73.
• Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.
• ----------------- (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
• --------------- (1972). Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. Mouton: The Hague.
• --------------- (1973). "Conditions on Transformation" in Anderson, S. R. (ed.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle (PP. 232-86). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• ---------------- (1979). Language and Responsibility. Brighton: Harvester Press
• ---------------- (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordercht: Foris.
• Clark, H. & Stafford, R. (1969). Memory for Semantics Features of the Verb in Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, PP. 326-334.
• Cook, V. (1988). Chomsky's Universal Grammar/ An Introduction. London: Blackwell.
• Cook, W. (1989). Case Grammar Theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
• Crystal, D. (1971). Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Crystal, D. (1988). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cullicover, P. (1976). Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
• Dinnen, F. P. (1969). An Introduction to General Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Fiebach, C.J. et al. (2005). "Revisiting the Role of Broca's Area in Sentence Processing: Syntactic Integration versus Syntactic Working Memory" in Human Brain Mapping. 24, 79–91.
• Fillenbaum, S. & Rapport, A. (1971). Structures in the Subjective Lexicon. New York: Academic Press.\
• Fillmore, Ch. (1968). "The Case for Case". In Bach and Harms (ed.): Universals in Linguistic Theory PP. 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
• Fillmore, Charles J. (1975). “An alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning” in Papers from the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society PP.123-132.
• Frazier, Lyn. (1987). Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Dutch in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, PP.519–559.
• Friederici, Angela & Jürgen Weissenborn (2007). "Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface" in Brain Research 1146 P.52. Available on line doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.038.
• Gleason, J. and Rather, N. (1993). Psycholinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Gotlob Freg (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25-50. Translated as ‘On Sense and Reference’ by M. Black in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black (eds. and trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). "The Neurology of Syntax: Language Use without Broca's Area" in Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, PP.1–21.
• Haegeman, L. (1992). Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Harris, R. (1995). The Linguistics War. New York: Oxford University
• Hartmann, R. & F. C. Stork (1972). Dictionary of language and linguistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Hendricks, P. & de Hoop (2001). "Optimality Theoretical Semantics" in Linguistics and Philosophy 24, PP. 1-32.
• Hoeks, J. & P. Hendricks (2006) (Submitted). "Optimality Theory and Human Sentence Processing: Towards a Cross-Modular Analysis of Coordination" Manuscript, University of Groningen, May 2006. [Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive].
• Hoop, H. de & Swart, H. de (1998), ‘Temporal Adjunct Clauses in Optimality Theory’. Manuscript, OTS Utrecht.
• Horrocks, G. (1987). Generative Grammar. London: Longman.
• Katz, J. & Fodor, J. (1963). "The Structure of a Semantic Theory" in Language Vol. 39, No. 2. PP 170-210. Available on line:http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0097-8507%28196304%2F06%2939%3A2%3C170%3ATSOAST%3E2.0.CO%3B2-
• Katz, J. (April 1981). Literal Meaning and Logical Theory in The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 78, No. 4, PP. 203-233. meaning
• Kess, J. & R. Hoppe (1981). Ambiguity in Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Kintsch, W. & G. Glass (1974). "Effects of Propositional Structure upon Sentences Recall". In W. Kintsch (ed.), The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Kintsch, W. & J. M. Keenan (1973). "Reading Rate and Retention as a Function of the Number of Prepositions in the Base Structure of Sentences" in Cognitive Psychology 3, PP. 257-274.
• Kusters, W. (2003). "Linguistic Complexity; The Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection". Ph.D. thesis, Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalkunde, Utrecht. LOT dissertation series 77.
• Lakoff, George. (1976 [1963]). Toward Generative Semantics. In J. D. McCawley (ed.) PP. 43-61.
• Leech, G. (1976). Semantics. London: Penguin.
• Lodovici, S. V. (1996). "Constraints on Subjects. An Optimality Theoretic Analysis". Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
• Lyons, J. (1979). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lyons, J. (1982). Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lyons, J. (1996). Linguistic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Miller, G. A. & k. E. McKean (1964). "A Chronometric Study of Some Relations between Sentences" in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, PP. 297-308.
• Noyer, R. (1993). Optimal Words: Towards a Declarative Theory of Word-Formation. MS. Rutgers Optimality Workshop-1.
• Petra Hendriks & Helen de Hoop (1997). On the Interpretation of Semantic Relations in the Absence of Syntactic Structures in P. Dekker, M. Stokhof & Y. Venema (Eds), Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, PP. 157-162.
• Prideaux, G. (1984). "Positional Tendencies of English Relative Clauses as Evidence for Processing Strategies" in A. Makkai & A. Melby (eds.), Festchrift for Rulon Wells. Lake Bluff: Jupiter Press.
• Prince, A. & P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado.
• Quirk, R., G. Leech, and J. Svartvik (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
• Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Riley, P. (1985).Discourse and Learning (ed.). London. Longman
• Robins, R. (1964). General Linguistics: An Introductory Survey. London: Longman.
• Ross, John R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Published in Ross (1986) Infinitive Syntax, Albex. Available on line http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15166 .
• Savin, H. B. & Perchonock, E. (1965). "Grammatical Structure and Immediate Recall of English Sentences" in Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4, PP. 348-353.
• Searle, John (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Simpson, J. (1979). A First Course in Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Thompson-Schill, Sh. (2005). "Dissecting the Language Organ: A New Look at the Role of Broca's Area in Language Processing" in The Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics by Anne Cutler (ed.). PP. 173-191. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Zgusta, L. et al. Manual of Lexicography. (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 39) Prague: Academia. The Hague: Mouton.
• Zurif, E. et al. (1993). "An online Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia" in Brain Lang. 45, PP. 448–464.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Al-Adab journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
How to Cite
