Action Identification of The Employees

Authors

  • Maysam Younus Jabbar AL-Khazraji Baghdad University- College of Arts
  • Diar Awni Fadhil AL-Mufti Baghdad University- College of Arts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i139.2627

Keywords:

action identification, explained, the employees

Abstract

The theory of action identification is based on far reaching objectives and the ways of their achievement. To achieve the research objectives, the researcher adopted the theory of action identification by Vallacher & Wegner (2011) for designing the instrument for measuring action identification consisting of 30 items.  The research sample consisted of 400 employees aged between (23-62), with different education levels (secondary, diploma, bachelor) (graduate) in Baghdad governorate. The results revealed that:

  • The sample of employees highly enjoyed action identification.
  • The correlational differences in action identification  among the employees are as follows;
  1. There is a significant difference in action identification with reference to gender variable.
  2. There is no significant difference inaction identification with reference to education level variable.
  3. There is no significant difference inaction identification with reference to age variable. The study came up with a number of recommendations as follows;     

- Activating the role of psychological guides and mentors through conferences and symposiums.

- Educating the employees with the knowledge of action identification. 

Finally, a number of further studies are suggested..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Zobaie, Abdul-Jalil and Bakr, Muhammad Elias and Al-Nani, Ibrahim Abdul-Mohsen. (1987). Psychological tests and measures. Mosul University: Dar Al Kutub for Printing and Publishing.

Anastasi, A. (1997). Psychological Testing. (7th ed.), New York: Macmillan publishing co.

Barriga, P. A. (2014). Antecedentes Psicológicos del Consecuencialismo Intransigente. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.‏

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. Bmj, 314(7080), 570-572.‏

Ceballos Vacas, E. M. (1994). The readability of Mothers' Educational Practices and Goals in Relation to Their Content and Organization.‏ Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, University La Laguna.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement, New Jersy: Prentice-Hall Company.

Geldenhuys, M., Laba, K., & Venter, C. M. (2014). Meaningful work, work engagement and organisational commitment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 01-10.‏

Ghadi, M. Y. (2012). The role of Meaningful Work and Employee Engagement in Understanding the Relationship Between Transformational leadership and Work Outcomes: An employee Perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wollongong.

Jamnadass, E. S., Badcock, J. C., & Maybery, M. T. (2014). Subclinical checking is associated with a bias towards goal-directed (high-level) action identification. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(1), 1-5.‏

Kozak, M. N., Marsh, A. A., & Wegner, D. M. (2006). What do i think you're doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 543.‏

Levesque, K. J. (2012). The relationship Between the Five Factor Model of Personality, Personal Agency, and Gender. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, Humboldt State University.‏

Michaels, J. L., Parkin, S. S., Vallacher, R. R. (2013). Destiny Is in the Details: Action Identification in the Construction and Destruction of Meaning. In J. Hicks & C. Routledge (Eds.), The experience of Meaning in Life (pp. 103-115). Springer, Dordrecht.

Park, J. Y. (2014). Three Essays Examining the Influence of Goal Progress on Subsequent Goal Pursuit. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Iowa‏.

Pelt, A. (2016). Why? How? Prosocial Behavior nature in the induced hypocrisy. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, Université de Lorraine.

Richardson, H., & Morley, S. (2015). Action identification and meaning in life in chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 9(1), 1-32.‏

Schneider, B., & Martin, J. (1992). What Do Counsellors Think They Are Doing?. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 26(1), 67-79.‏

Shaeffer, E. M. (2009). Shifting Perspectives: Point of View in Visual images Affects Abstract and Concrete Thinking. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, The Ohio State University.‏

Somoza, M. P. (1987). Action Identification Theory in Effective versus Ineffective Performance. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Florida Atlantic University.‏

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3-15.‏

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660-671.‏

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Action identification theory. In P. A.,Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume 1 (pp. 327-349). SAGE publications.‏

Watkins, E. (2011). Dysregulation in level of goal and action identification across psychological disorders. Clinical Psychology review, 31(2), 260-278.‏

Wegner, D M., & Vallacher, R. R. (1986). Action identification. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds). Handbook of cognition and motivation (pp. 550-582). New York: Guilford Press.

Williams, N. P. (2001). Mind Over Matter: Action Identification as a Mediator of Underperformance in Stereotype Threat. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, Hamilton College.‏

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

Issue

Section

Educational and psychological sciences

How to Cite

AL-Khazraji, M. Y. J., & AL-Mufti, D. A. F. (2021). Action Identification of The Employees. Al-Adab Journal, 2(139), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i139.2627

Publication Dates