Evaluative Resources in Medical Research Articles Written by Medical Writers
Many studies have been presented about the topic of medical researches and articles ,but it has been noticed that the previously mentioned studies haven’t dealt with language usage in terms of attitude and emotional status . Such a topic still needs more attention from scholars and researchers . The current study is expected to enrich the literature about medical articles from a linguistic point of view. The evaluation was done following Martin and White model (2005) which mainly comprised of three important systems ( attitude , engagement and graduation).
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124.
English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fryer, Daniel Lees (2013) Exploring the dialogism of academic discourse: Heteroglossic Engagement in medical research articles, University of Gothenburg
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. London: Oxford University Press
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Text, process and practice (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.
Lee, S.H. (2008). Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays. Prospect 23, 43-58
Liu , Xinghua (2013) Evaluation in Chinese University EFL Students’English Argumentative Writing: An APPRAISAL Study, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 40–53
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142–175). London: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. (2001). ‘Fair trade: negotiating meaning in multimodal texts’ in P. Coppock (ed.), The Semiotics of Writing: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Technology of Writing. Brepols (Semiotic & Cognitive Studies X). 311–38.
Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum
Martin, J.R., & White, P.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in
Martin, JR, and Rose. D (2007). Working with Discourse: meaning beyond the clause, 2nd ed. London: Continuum [2nd revised edition].
Pascual, M., & Unger, L. (2010). Appraisal in research genres: An analysis of grant proposals by Argentinean researchers. Revista Signos, 43(73), 261-280.
Rossette, Fiona (2014) Exploring the Expression of High Degree in a Corpus of Oral English, university of Paris.
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Journal of Applied Linguistic, 22(1), 58–77.
All copyrights are reserved for the AL-Adab Journal. It is prohibited to print, copy, translate or re compose the journal whether completely or partly. Recording on cassettes, saving to computer or programming on optical discs are also prohibited without a written consent of the publisher, otherwise legal prosecution will take place by the Iraqi judicature.
Editor in chief